Leon Neyfakh

Leon Neyfakh, creator of 'Final Thoughts,' dives into the intriguing life of Jerry Springer, from his earnest political roots to his role as a chaotic TV host. They discuss how Springer became a cultural icon while grappling with the complexities of his dual identity. Neyfakh also tackles broader themes of media sensationalism and America's confusing historical narrative, particularly the interpretation of its founding. The conversation weaves through the impact of spectacle on civic identity, reflecting on the blurred lines between public service and entertainment.

Leon Neyfakh, co-creator of Slow Burn and host of Fiasco, takes listeners on a deep dive into the 2012 Benghazi attack. He sheds light on the political upheaval that followed and its implications for U.S. foreign policy. Neyfakh shares gripping stories, including the fight for freedom against Gaddafi's oppressive regime and the harrowing tales from Abu Salim Prison. Exploring the rise and fall of Gaddafi, he delves into the complexities of U.S.-Libya relations, revealing how past clashes shape contemporary geopolitics.

Historian Rick Perlstein and journalist Leon Neyfakh discuss the rise of movement conservatism in the 1970s, including battles over desegregation, gay rights, and abortion. They explore Reagan's campaign, white backlash, and right-wing rhetoric, disinterring forgotten figures crucial to conservatism's rise.

Leon Neyfakh, creator of acclaimed podcasts like Slow Burn and Fiasco, dives deep into the infamous Bernie Goetz case, where the so-called 'Subway Vigilante' shot four young men in 1984. He discusses the profound impact of this incident on New York City, focusing on the media frenzy and public fear at the time. The conversation highlights the legal repercussions that haunted Goetz for years and raises probing questions about vigilantism, self-defense, and society’s complex perceptions of justice. It's a gripping exploration of crime and morality.

Leon Neyfakh, creator of the podcast Slow Burn, joins the discussion to dissect Al Gore's poignant concession speech after the tumultuous 2000 election. They explore how Gore emphasized unity and respect for democracy, even amidst his disagreement with the Supreme Court's ruling. The conversation delves into the legacy of that election, questioning whether Gore was too accommodating to established norms. They analyze the enduring relevance of Gore's message as political tensions resurface in today’s landscape.