Guests Peter Baker, Chief White House correspondent for The New York Times, and Jonathan Swan, a White House reporter for the same paper, delve into the drama of Donald Trump's spectacular return to the presidency. They analyze his divisive inaugural speech that eschews traditional unity in favor of a nationalist vision. The conversation highlights Trump's swift executive actions, including controversial pardons for January 6 rioters, signaling a stark policy shift and a robust rallying of his supporters towards bold changes.

Maggie Haberman, a seasoned White House correspondent, joins Jonathan Swan, known for his sharp political insights, and Charlie Savage, an expert in national security law. They delve into Trump's ambitious power grab during his second term, exploring aggressive immigration policies and his reshaping of the Republican Party. The discussion highlights Congress's passive response and the implications of Trump's loyalist appointments on U.S. democracy, raising concerns about the erosion of checks and balances in the government.

Jonathan Swan, a White House reporter for The New York Times, dives into the dramatic resurgence of Stephen Miller in the Trump administration. He discusses Miller's deeply rooted anti-immigrant ideologies and his rapid ascent to replace deputy chief of staff. The conversation reveals the powerful impact of Miller’s policies, the complexities of immigration strategy, and the dynamics of power play within the White House. Swan also touches on Miller's past influences and the aggressive direction of future initiatives, particularly in relation to Trump's agenda.

Karoun Demirjian is a Congressional reporter for The New York Times with a focus on national security, while Jonathan Swan covers politics and Trump’s campaigns. They delve into the tense saga of Pete Hegseth’s nomination for Secretary of Defense, exploring Senator Joni Ernst's resistance fueled by concerns over military sexual assault and political ramifications. The duo discusses how Trump's allies mounted a campaign to diminish Ernst's skepticism, illustrating the high-stakes machinations and pressures within the GOP as they navigate internal disagreements.

Jonathan Swan, a White House reporter for The New York Times, offers keen insights into Elon Musk's bold incursion into federal operations. The discussion covers Musk's controversial tactics that leave agencies in chaos, including his takeover of USAID. Swan reveals the tension between public service and private interests, while highlighting the growing mistrust towards bureaucratic norms. The podcast also dives into the ideological battles over USAID's budget, framed within a larger political agenda questioning 'woke' policies, ultimately illuminating the clash of technology and governance.

Jessica Cheung, a senior producer at The Daily, joins Jonathan Swan, a New York Times political reporter, and Craig Berland, Chair of the Maricopa County Republican Committee. They explore Donald Trump's unorthodox campaign strategies in swing states, focusing on Maricopa County's political climate. The discussion addresses efforts to ensure election integrity, the balance between traditional campaigning and targeting voter sentiment, and how community volunteers shape the campaign's approach. Expect an intriguing insight into the polarized dynamics of a pivotal election.

Maggie Haberman, a senior political correspondent for The New York Times, and Jonathan Swan, a political reporter covering Trump's campaign, dive into the tumultuous aftermath of the election. They reveal the internal struggles and shifts in morale at Trump's campaign headquarters as uncertainty transformed into confidence. The duo discusses the bizarre dynamics during a rally filled with grievances, as well as the complexities of Trump's transition and potential cabinet choices. Legal implications and political maneuvers for Trump's second term are also unpacked amidst ongoing challenges.

Political correspondents Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman, along with national security correspondent Charlie Savage, discuss the potential consequences of a second Trump presidency, highlighting his radical vision and strategic plans. Topics include his approach to immigration, national security, consolidation of power, control over media and regulatory powers, and his vision for the Department of Justice. They analyze Trump's appeal to supporters, focus on projecting strength, and the impact on American democracy.

Jonathan Swan, a political correspondent for The New York Times, dives into the fiery debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. He details how Harris dominated the conversation, making it all about Trump's temperament rather than her record. The discussion covers key issues like immigration, crime, and economic inequality, revealing tensions and strategic deflection tactics. Swan also highlights how Harris's provocative questioning shifted the narrative, exposing Trump's vulnerabilities amidst ongoing legal controversies. A gripping analysis of debate dynamics unfolds.

Jonathan Swan, a political reporter for The New York Times specializing in the Trump campaign, reveals the unexpected upheaval in Trump’s political strategies. The discussion covers Trump's disorientation in response to Kamala Harris's emergence as a formidable opponent. Swan highlights Trump's self-sabotaging tactics and the backlash from controversial remarks, detailing how these have complicated his campaign. The conversation provides a compelling look at the shifting dynamics as Trump's confidence wavers under pressure.