Jonathan Gienapp, a law and history professor at Stanford and author of "Against Constitutional Originalism," dives into the fraught relationship between originalism and historical interpretation. He critiques how originalists overlook founding intentions and the dynamic nature of law. The conversation also highlights the troubling influences of tech billionaires in politics and the implications of youth culture in governance. Gienapp emphasizes the importance of civic engagement and a more nuanced understanding of constitutional principles for a healthy democracy.

In this engaging discussion, Jonathan Gienapp, a Stanford professor and author of "Against Constitutional Originalism," joins Stephen Sachs, a Harvard Law expert on constitutional law, to challenge the concept of originalism in legal interpretation. They explore the historical development of originalism and its influence on landmark Supreme Court cases, including the Second Amendment debates. The conversation also touches on the role of popular sovereignty at the nation's founding, prompting listeners to reconsider how the Constitution is understood today.

Jonathan Gienapp, an associate professor at Stanford and author of "Against Constitutional Originalism," teams up with Harvard's Stephen Sachs, a noted constitutional scholar, for a spirited debate. They unpack the historical roots and assumptions behind constitutional originalism, contrasting it with the notion of a living Constitution. The conversation dives into critical cases like Fletcher v. Peck and the implications of originalism on contemporary issues, particularly regarding the Second Amendment and the evolving understanding of rights in governance.