
John Charmley
Professor of modern history at the University of East Anglia. Author of books on Chamberlain and Churchill.
Top 3 podcasts with John Charmley
Ranked by the Snipd community

Jul 31, 2022 • 1h 36min
The Sunday Debate: Britain Should Not Have Fought in the First World War
Dominic Sandbrook, a historian and BBC broadcaster, joins renowned author Max Hastings, Professor John Charmley, and Margaret MacMillan, an expert in international history, for a riveting debate on Britain's involvement in the First World War. They delve into the moral and geopolitical motivations behind the war, questioning long-held narratives. The discussion tackles Britain's obligations towards Belgium, critiques the human cost of conflict, and examines the enduring impact on national identity. Audiences engage with shifting perspectives that challenge the justification for war.

Apr 2, 2023 • 1h 36min
Britain Should Not Have Fought in the First World War
In a riveting discussion, historians Dominic Sandbrook, Max Hastings, John Charmley, and Margaret MacMillan debate Britain's involvement in the First World War. Sandbrook critiques the emotional basis of war decisions while Hastings questions the portrayal of Germany as the sole aggressor. Charmley highlights the complex motivations behind intervention, and MacMillan warns against glorifying warfare. They explore the nuanced impacts of British actions, ponder alternative outcomes, and urge careful examination of historical narratives that shape modern foreign policy.

Jan 23, 2022 • 1h 3min
The Sunday Debate: Neville Chamberlain Did The Right Thing
Join esteemed historians John Charmley, Sir Richard Evans, Glyn Stone, and Piers Brendan as they explore the contentious legacy of Neville Chamberlain's appeasement strategy before World War II. They delve into the intricate political dynamics of the era, questioning whether Chamberlain's decisions were a necessary gamble for peace or a missed opportunity for intervention. The discussion also highlights the complexities of forming alliances and the moral implications of national self-interest during a time of looming conflict, offering a fresh perspective on this pivotal moment in history.