
Joe Warne
Founder of the Sports Sciences Replication Center (SSRC). Senior author of a study on the replicability of sports and exercise science research.
Top 3 podcasts with Joe Warne
Ranked by the Snipd community

18 snips
Feb 19, 2025 • 1h 28min
Can You Trust Your Sports Watch?
Dr. Joe Warne, a former international athlete and performance coach, dives into the reliability of data from wearable tech. He critiques accuracy, especially around heart rate metrics, and urges listeners to carefully interpret the data. The discussion emphasizes the balance between data reliance and intuitive understanding in athletic training. Warne also explores the rapid evolution of sports technology, questioning the impact of marketing versus functionality, and looks towards the future of AI in sports. Get ready to rethink the metrics that matter!

14 snips
Mar 13, 2024 • 1h 44min
Can We Trust Sport Science Research?
The podcast delves into the credibility crisis in sports science research, highlighting issues of reliability, bias, and publication standards. Dr. Joe Warne discusses the challenges of replicating studies and the importance of research quality. The conversation explores the role of sample sizes, deceptive reporting in nutrition studies, and the need for better research practices. It also addresses the complexities of meta-analysis and urges a critical approach to sports science research.

4 snips
Jun 23, 2025 • 1h 20min
Most Sports Science Research is False: The Replication Crisis Hits Sport
In this engaging discussion, Joe Warne, founder of the Sports Sciences Replication Center, uncovers the startling truth about sports science research. A staggering 72% of published studies fail to replicate, casting doubt on the reliability of findings. Joe shares insights on the systemic issues within academic publishing, including the 'publish or perish' mentality. He also critiques the lack of data sharing among researchers. Ultimately, he urges coaches and athletes to be skeptical of unverified claims and advocates for meaningful changes in scientific practices.