It’s hard to think of an invention that has been more transformative to women than the birth control pill. Suddenly, American women possessed a power that women never before in history had: They could control when they got pregnant. They could have sex like . . . men. The pill—and the profound legal, political and cultural changes that the sexual revolution and feminism ushered in—liberated women. Those movements have allowed women to lead lives that literally were not possible beforehand.But here we are, half a century later, with a culture in which porn and casual sex are abundant, but marriage and birth rates are at historic lows. And many people are asking: Did we go wrong somewhere along the way? Was the sexual revolution actually bad for women?The debaters:Jill Filiopvic is an author and attorney who has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian and many other publications. You can follow her writing on her newsletter.Louise Perry, based in London, is columnist at the The New Statesman. She is the author of the new book: “The Case Against the Sexual Revolution.” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The oldest members of the Millennial generation are reaching their forties and feel they’ve been left behind emotionally and financially. Those who agree say Millennials pay more for basic items, leading them unable to afford to buy a home or have children. Those who disagree say that not buying a house or having kids are their choices and they will soon be doing well financially. With this context, we debate: Will Millennials Be Left Behind?  Arguing Yes: Jill Filipovic, Journalist, lawyer, and author   Arguing No: Scott Winship, Senior Fellow and Director of the Center of Opportunity and Social Mobility at the American Enterprise Institute Nick Gillespie, Editor-at-Large of Reason, is the guest moderator.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Katie Stallard, a senior editor at the New Statesman, alongside columnists Jill Filipovic and Sohrab Ahmari, dissect the high stakes of the 2024 US presidential election. They explore the potential outcomes of a Trump or Harris victory, touching on crucial topics like immigration policies and women's rights. The discussion highlights the unexpected sidelining of climate change in the election narrative and addresses the international implications of U.S. foreign policies. Tension and distrust surrounding election day also come to the fore, emphasizing the stakes for both America and the world.

Travis Doss, Georgia's election officials' president, shares the harrowing reality of navigating election integrity amidst political pressure. Jill Filipovic discusses how manipulation threatens democracy, while Katie Stallard reveals the looming legal challenges with 120 lawsuits in play. Dawn Brancati warns of potential unrest as delays in results could spark civil discord. The conversation delves into the erosion of trust in electoral processes and how election officials are increasingly facing threats in a charged political climate.

Jill Filipovic, a journalist and author of 'OK Boomer, Let’s Talk,' delves into the gender dynamics reshaping political campaigns. She discusses how the Republican strategy appeals to disaffected men while questioning its potential effectiveness. Filipovic highlights the contrasts in how male and female voters prioritize issues, and she notes the evolving political landscape with figures like Kamala Harris redefining inclusivity. The conversation sheds light on masculinity in politics and the importance of addressing women’s rights alongside moderate male concerns.