Jeremy W. Peters

Jeremy W. Peters, a national reporter for The New York Times, joins Steve Bannon, former chief strategist for Donald Trump. They dive into Bannon's intense concerns over threats within the MAGA movement, from foreign policy conflicts to the influence of tech billionaires. Bannon reflects on internal betrayals and the urgent need to preserve Trumpism. The discussion reveals sharp divides in conservative ideology, particularly regarding military actions and their clash with traditional Republican values, all while addressing ongoing challenges in rural America.

In this engaging conversation, Jeremy W. Peters, a New York Times correspondent specializing in media and politics, dives into the legal battle facing Fox News over its election fraud claims. He highlights how internal communications reveal a knotted relationship between truth and profit, with the network prioritizing ratings over journalistic integrity. The discussion also explores the complexities of proving defamation and the broader implications for media accountability in today's polarized environment, raising questions about the responsibility of news organizations.

Jeremy W. Peters, a media and politics correspondent for The New York Times, provides insight into Tucker Carlson's surprising exit from Fox News following a massive lawsuit settlement. They discuss the implications of his departure for the conservative media landscape and analyze Carlson's influence on political narratives during the Trump era. The conversation also touches on the network's revenue reliance on his ratings, internal controversies, and how these dynamics might reshape Fox's future as a media powerhouse.

Jeremy W. Peters, a media and politics correspondent for The New York Times, shares insights from inside the courtroom during the surprising settlement between Dominion Voting Systems and Fox News. He discusses the strong evidence Dominion had, the intense courtroom atmosphere, and the implications of Rupert Murdoch potentially testifying. The last-minute $787.5 million settlement raises questions about accountability in media and whether it will lead to meaningful change at Fox or simply reinforce its profit-driven strategy.

Jeremy Peters, a New York Times reporter covering the landmark Dominion Voting Systems defamation case against Fox News, delves into the potential consequences of media misinformation. He discusses Rupert Murdoch's surprising defense strategy and the implications of the ongoing lawsuit for First Amendment rights. The conversation also touches on the unraveling Murdoch-Trump relationship and the future of Fox News as new political figures, like Ron DeSantis, emerge. A fascinating look at the intersection of media accountability and politics!

Join Jeremy W. Peters, a New York Times reporter specializing in Fox News, along with media critic Margaret Sullivan and Jonah Goldberg, editor of The Dispatch, as they dissect the intriguing power dynamics among Tucker Carlson, Rupert Murdoch, and Donald Trump. They delve into Carlson's controversial exit, the shifting sands of Fox News as the elections loom, and the evolving landscape of political media. Expect insights into how these relationships impact viewer loyalty and the broader implications for traditional journalism versus social media.

Join legal minds Andrew Branca, a self-defense expert, Ronnie Richter, a lawyer for Murdaugh's victims, and Peter Tragos, a YouTube host, as they dissect the gripping details of the Murdaugh trial, including key evidence that led to his conviction. They analyze the judge's powerful moment and speculate on the defense's appeal. Meanwhile, Jeremy Peters from The New York Times and former First Amendment lawyer George Freeman delve into the complex realm of the Dominion-Fox News lawsuit, discussing media ethics, defamation challenges, and the responsibility of truth in journalism.

Join insightful minds Charles C.W. Cooke, a Senior Writer for National Review, Jeremy Peters from The New York Times, and personal finance guru Dave Ramsey as they dissect the recent State of the Union address. They tackle Biden's credibility, critique the lack of focus on international issues, and debate the true state of the economy. The conversation dives into the complexities of today's job market, the challenges of inflation, and the reality of the housing market, all while navigating the political landscape leading into the 2024 elections.

In this engaging discussion, Jonah Goldberg, a renowned conservative columnist, Jeremy Peters, a New York Times reporter, and pollster Kristen Soltis Anderson dive into the troubling rise of election denial in America. They analyze the implications of gerrymandering, the evolving sentiments within the GOP regarding election integrity, and the emotional fallout from these controversies. The trio also addresses the role of media in shaping public perception and the dangers of ignoring voter ID discussions. The conversation sheds light on tribal politics and the urgent need for open dialogue.

In this lively discussion, Charles C.W. Cooke, a senior writer at National Review, teams up with journalist Jeremy Peters, along with Matt Welch and Nancy Rommelmann, to dissect President Biden's recent State of the Union address. They critique its disjointed messaging and Biden’s growing disconnect with voters, particularly over calls to fund vs. defund police. The conversation also dives into pandemic hypocrisy among Democrats, media narratives vs. public sentiment, and a fascinating exploration of cultural phenomena, including chilling interviews with infamous criminals.