Slate’s Jeremy Stahl discusses Trump's 34 guilty counts in hush money trial. They explore the verdict, potential consequences, and why jail time is unlikely soon. The podcast delves into Trump's courtroom reactions, public responses, and implications for the rule of law.

Jeremy Stahl, a Jurisprudence editor at Slate, dives into the complex legal landscape following the Supreme Court's ruling on Trump’s immunity. He analyzes how this decision is reshaping the prosecution strategies against the former president. Stahl discusses the adjustments made by Jack Smith in the election interference cases and the shifting dynamics of Trump's legal approach since the landmark ruling. Their conversation reveals the intricate balance between law and politics in a historically unprecedented situation.

Jeremy Stahl from Slate discusses former President Trump's historic guilty verdict on 34 felony counts in his hush money trial, explaining the jury's decision, what comes next, and the likelihood of Trump going to jail. The podcast explores the impact of the verdict on accountability, the rule of law, and the upcoming election.

Slate’s jurisprudence editor Jeremy Stahl discusses the historic guilty verdict against former President Trump on all 34 counts in a hush money trial. Topics include courtroom tension, jury reactions, judge's conduct, and the significance of the conviction for upholding the rule of law.

Slate's jurisprudence editor, Jeremy Stahl, discusses the Stormy Daniels' testimony in Trump's hush-money trial. Judge highlights defense's lack of objections. Exploring the legal intricacies and drama surrounding the trial, including Trump's behavior and first amendment rights.