Jamelle Bouie

Join New York Times political columnist Jamelle Bouie as he sheds light on the often-overlooked Belle Moskowitz, revealing her pivotal role in early 20th-century New York politics. The conversation navigates the fascinating dynamics between Robert Moses and Al Smith, highlighting the tension between reform and nativism. Bouie explores Smith's rise from tenements to political prominence, the complexities of legislative language, and the quest for green spaces amid urbanization. The discussion offers a rich tapestry of power, ambition, and the intricate politics of the past.

Journalist Jamelle Bouie, a columnist for the New York Times renowned for his political insight, sits down to discuss the far-reaching ramifications of Donald Trump's presidency. They delve into the shifting political landscape, exploring concerns about authoritarianism and the evolving judiciary. Bouie emphasizes the complexities of voter behavior, urging ongoing civic engagement. The conversation reveals how historical dynamics intertwine with modern politics, reflecting on the 'us versus them' mentality shaping America today.

Jamelle Bouie, a New York Times Opinion columnist with a knack for historical analysis, joins former attorney David French to discuss significant legal challenges during the Trump administration. They dive into the alarming defiance of a Supreme Court ruling concerning the wrongful deportation of a Maryland man. The conversation highlights the implications for the judicial system, the historical context of legal rights, and the importance of civil protections for all individuals. They advocate for active civic engagement in defending democracy and individual rights.

In this discussion, Jamelle Bouie, a New York Times columnist, and Kate Shaw, a constitutional law professor, argue that the Electoral College subverts the will of the majority. They highlight historical failures, including presidents who won without the popular vote. Countering this, Tara Ross and Bradley A. Smith stress the necessity of the system for minority representation and political balance. The debate examines whether the original intentions of the founders align with modern democratic ideals, leaving listeners to weigh the pros and cons of reform versus retention.

In this engaging discussion, Jamelle Bouie, a New York Times columnist and former Slate writer, joins Emily Bazelon and John Dickerson to dissect the recent Trump-Putin summit and its implications for U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding Ukraine. They critique the deployment of National Guard troops in D.C. as a response to urban crime, weighing the political ramifications. The trio also dives into the complexities of college admissions and the impact of new presidential directives on diversity and race in education.

Jamel Bouie, a New York Times columnist known for his sharp insights on race and politics, joins Steve Ratner, a seasoned Wall Street financier and former Treasury official, for a deep dive into the implications of Trump's recent political maneuvers. They discuss the risks of unchecked political power and the politicization of institutions like the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The conversation also tackles the integrity of job statistics in an uncertain economy and the urgency of gerrymandering reform to protect electoral integrity amid a polarized landscape.

David French, a senior editor at The Dispatch known for his conservative insights, and Jamelle Bouie, a New York Times columnist focusing on race and identity, dive into the rising trend of 'toxic empathy' in politics. They discuss how empathy has become a contentious issue, particularly on the right, and the historical disdain for compassion in political discourse. The conversation highlights the decline of Christian compassion and the struggles of the Democratic Party to revive empathy amid societal divisions, underscoring the complexities of modern political identities.

Jamelle Bouie, a New York Times columnist and co-host of "Unclear on Present Danger," dives deep into the current political landscape. He critiques Trump's inept governance and discusses the need for Democrats to reconnect with voters outside election seasons. Bouie reflects on Frederick Douglass's insights into America's moral failures and emphasizes civic engagement. He also addresses election integrity and the Democrats' struggle against perceptions of elitism, calling for a reimagined approach to local voter engagement.

Michelle Goldberg, an Opinion columnist at The New York Times, and Jamelle Bouie, another insightful columnist from the same publication, discuss the chaos surrounding Trump’s immigration policies. They delve into the backlash against mass deportations and the rise of local resistance movements. The duo examines the harsh realities faced at the immigration courts and the ethical challenges of enforcement agents. Additionally, they explore how shifting public sentiments could reshape Democratic strategies to reclaim the narrative on immigration.

Jamelle Bouie, an opinion columnist at The New York Times, Sherrilyn Ifill, a civil rights lawyer and founding director at Howard University, and Steve Vladeck, a Georgetown Law professor, join the discussion. They dive deep into the Supreme Court's recent term, unpacking the major rulings on reproductive rights and LGBTQ issues. The panel critiques the shadow docket's implications, explores the evolving judicial integrity, and highlights the importance of historical context in court decisions. Their insights reflect broader trends affecting marginalized voices and judicial activism.