Get the app
J. Bostock
Contributor to LessWrong and author of the essay narrated in this episode, discussing the epistemic anti-pattern called 'exhaustive free association.' Known within rationalist/EA communities for writing on reasoning and argumentation.
Best podcasts with J. Bostock
Ranked by the Snipd community
Oct 12, 2025
• 8min
“The Most Common Bad Argument In These Parts” by J Bostock
chevron_right
J. Bostock, a contributor to LessWrong, explores a troubling reasoning flaw known as 'exhaustive free association,' frequently seen in rationalist communities. He illustrates how this pattern misleads by inducing false conclusions through incomplete logic. Bostock critiques superforecasters for underestimating AI risks and discusses the implications of exhaustive reasoning on welfare estimates. The episode dives into the persuasive nature of bad arguments and emphasizes the importance of challenging this reasoning style to enhance discourse.
The AI-powered Podcast Player
Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
Get the app