Constitutional law expert Harold Krent, a professor at the Chicago-Kent College of Law, discusses cases coming up in 2023 at the Supreme Court, from a challenge to President Biden's student loan program, to a possible reckoning for social media companies, to the Navaho Nation's fight over water rights.June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this discussion, Dave Ehrenberg, Palm Beach County State Attorney, sheds light on the complex legal proceedings surrounding the high-profile Mangione murder case. Eric Goldman, a law professor, dives into the implications of the TikTok ban, weighing First Amendment rights against national security. Constitutional expert Harold Krent dissects President Biden's clemency decisions, revealing the intricacies of pardons in a politically fraught environment. The conversation navigates the intersection of tech law, public safety, and justice in today's charged climate.

Robert Mintz, a former federal prosecutor, delves into the implications of a judge's refusal to dismiss Donald Trump's New York hush money conviction, exploring the complexities of presidential immunity. Meanwhile, Harold Krent, a constitutional law expert, analyzes President Biden's controversial clemency grants, which have sparked backlash due to their broad scope, including serious offenses. The discussion unravels the intricate moral and political issues surrounding presidential pardons and their potential effects on future legal landscapes.

Chris Dolmetsch, a Bloomberg legal reporter, dives into the recent reconsideration of Bill Hwang's 19-year sentence for securities fraud, revealing the judge's surprising insights. Meanwhile, Harold Krent, a law professor, unpacks the complexities of President Biden's pardon powers and the political ramifications of potential clemencies, particularly regarding his son and even Donald Trump. Their discussion bridges pressing legal issues and the evolving dynamics within the justice system under presidential influence.

Kate Andrias, a labor law expert from Columbia Law School, highlights the threats a second Trump administration poses to recent labor gains. Harold Krent, from Chicago-Kent College of Law, discusses potential shifts in Supreme Court cases, particularly regarding regulations on healthcare for transgender minors and ghost guns. They explore how political leadership affects union rights, the legal landscape of labor relations, and the complexities surrounding executive influence on judicial proceedings.

Jonathan Kanter, U.S. Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, discusses the landmark ruling against Google, labeling it a monopolist and its implications for future antitrust regulation. Harold Krent, a law professor, examines the 8th Circuit's block of the Biden administration’s SAVE student loan relief program, affecting millions. They explore the complex interplay of legal frameworks and consumer behavior in antitrust cases, and dissect the legal obstacles for student debt relief amid significant court rulings.

Legal experts Harold Krent and Rick Garnett, along with Bloomberg News editor Elizabeth Wasserman, discuss the Supreme Court's rulings on presidential immunity, state laws regulating social media, and reproductive rights. They explore the implications of these decisions and the challenges they pose for future legal cases.

Joanne Hsu shares consumer sentiment data, Harold Krent discusses bump stock ban, David Welch talks Tesla CEO compensation, and Priya Misra covers market updates. Insights on labor market trends, Supreme Court rulings, stock options controversy, and diversity initiatives in workplaces.

Constitutional law Professor Harold Krent discusses the Supreme Court potentially overturning a 40-year old precedent that weakens federal agency power. Jennifer Rie, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Litigation Analyst, talks about a judge blocking the JetBlue-Spirit Airways $3.8 billion deal on antitrust grounds.

Trump's tumultuous day on the stand in a civil fraud case, choreographer's win in a copyright lawsuit against Epic Games, Supreme Court oral arguments on government facing lawsuits for false credit reports.