Gillian Tett

This engaging discussion features Gillian Tett, a seasoned economics commentator, and Katie Martin, a financial market expert. They delve into the recent decline of the U.S. dollar and how market volatility, influenced by unpredictable policies, may be a strategic move by Trump's team. Together, they explore the implications of a weaker dollar, potential benefits for the U.S. economy, and how investor uncertainty reshapes financial behavior. They also touch on intriguing global financial stories, connecting local events to broader economic trends.

In a thought-provoking dialogue, Yanis Varoufakis, the former Greek finance minister renowned for his critical perspective on capitalism, and Gillian Tett, a Financial Times columnist and anthropologist, tackle the pressing question of whether capitalism can be fixed. They debate ideas ranging from the risks of 'techno-feudalism' to the ethical dilemmas within global capitalism. The conversation also delves into the environmental impacts of corporate practices and calls for a community-oriented economic approach. Their insights challenge listeners to rethink the future of our economic systems.

Gillian Tett, an acclaimed Financial Times columnist and expert in economic anthropology, shares her insights on today's pressing economic challenges. She discusses the potential impact of a second Trump presidency and the ongoing battle against inflation in the UK. Tett also delves into the transformative effects of AI on our lives and how an anthropological perspective can illuminate cultural shifts influencing global investments. With a unique blend of economics and anthropology, she offers a thought-provoking view on the complexities reshaping our world.

When the Great Recession struck, it was the start of the most significant economic downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s. A slumping housing market revealed vulnerabilities of huge numbers of mortgage-backed securities and derivatives. In the aftermath, unemployment soared to 10%. GDP dropped by more than 4%, and federal authorities unleashed a series of unprecedented fiscal and monetary policies aimed at stemming the bleeding. When the dust finally settled, legislators and regulators pushed through a series of reforms meant to prevent the repeat of such a calamity. Fast forward to 2023 and the global banking system may be facing its most significant crisis since 2008. Within a short span, a run on deposits at Silicon Valley Bank quickly led to the third-largest bank failure in U.S. history, with Switzerland's Credit Suisse later seeking government lifelines. A second US regional bank — Signature Bank — failed, and a third — First Republic Bank — was propped up. To some, these are signs of the kinds of broader risks the global economy stared down in 2008. A combination of factors, including an eroding of regulations, sharp interest rate rises, mismanagement at banks, coupled with the overarching uncertainty of volatile crypto landscape, have raised new questions about the scale of turmoil that could confront markets. This cocktail of risks, some argue, has added such dangers to banking systems that it is no longer safer than it was in 2008. Others disagree. As bad this recent crisis appears to be, they say, regulatory reforms and liquidity requirements have made significant strides since the days of 2008. The system also effectively contained the contagion, something that required far greater government intervention in 2008. In that context, we debate the following question: Is the Banking System Safer Than It Was in 2008? Arguing YES: Jason Furman, Former Chairman, Council of Economic Advisers   Arguing NO: Gillian Tett , Editor-at-Large, Financial Times (U.S.) Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Gillian Tett, a Financial Times columnist with expertise in politics and the economy, joins to analyze the economic proposals leading up to the 2024 presidential election. They discuss how tariffs and inflation are shaping voter sentiments and what a hurricane season could mean for the election outcome. Tett elaborates on the historical context of tariffs and their implications on trade relations, alongside the stark differences between Trump and Biden’s trade policies. They also delve into how capitalism intersects with political narratives in today's polarized landscape.

Gillian Tett, a Financial Times columnist and anthropologist, discusses the importance of language in her work and why we should think like anthropologists. Topics include the etymology of words like 'company' and 'bank', similarities between Brits and Japanese in the workplace, and the value of anthropological thinking in today's world.

Former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis and Financial Times' Gillian Tett dive into the contentious question of capitalism's future. They examine whether capitalism can be redeemed or needs replacement, considering the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the rise of techno-feudalism. Their debate spans historical influences from socialism to modern tech monopolies, raising critical points about corporate governance and environmental sustainability. The discussion is lively, compelling, and thought-provoking, pushing listeners to rethink the economic landscape.

Sanam Vakil and Gillian Tett discuss Hamas' rejection of the ceasefire proposal in Gaza and the debate on using $300 billion in frozen Russian assets. Bill Gates explains the importance of nuclear energy. Sal Khan talks about AI in education. The podcast also covers British PM Rishi Sunak's controversial asylum plan.

Larry Fink discusses the retirement crisis. Glenn Hubbard compares Biden and Trump's policies. Gillian Tett talks about geopolitical risks. Joshua Bolten shares CEO priorities. Melissa Kearney advocates for standardized tests in college admissions.

In the wake of the Russian invasion, Ukraine has applied on a fast-track membership bid to join NATO. Those who argue “yes” say admitting Ukraine would keep the country protected, affirm its sovereignty, and solidify alignment with the West. Those who argue “no” say it will provoke Putin, escalate the conflict, and that it doesn’t yet meet NATO’s standards. Now we debate: Should NATO Admit Ukraine? Arguing Yes: Garry Kasparov, Founder of the Renew Democracy Initiative and former World Chess Champion   Arguing No: Charles Kupchan, Senior Fellow at the Council of Foreign Relations and Professor of International Affairs at Georgetown University Gillian Tett, Editorial Board Chair and Editor-at-Large US of the Financial Times and Incoming Provost at King’s College Cambridge, moderates.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices