Daniel Lakens

In this conversation with Daniel Lakens, an experimental psychologist at Eindhoven University of Technology, he tackles the trustworthiness of social science research. They discuss how p-hacking can distort findings and the need for rigorous methodologies. Daniel critiques psychology's fragmented theories, advocating for broader frameworks akin to physics. He also explores the limitations of peer review and suggests integrating diverse expertise to enhance research integrity. The episode finishes with insights on collaboration and the educational shifts needed in future research.

Daniel Lakens, an experimental psychologist at Eindhoven University of Technology, dives into the art of crafting effective research questions and experimental designs. He sheds light on the importance of open science and how it can reshape funding and publishing practices. The discussion also tackles the ongoing reproducibility crisis in psychology and the value of acknowledging flawed research. Lakens champions transparency and collaboration, advocating for better statistical education to enhance the credibility of scientific findings.