Claire Fox

Michael Binyon, a seasoned leader writer at The Times, and Claire Fox, a prominent non-affiliated peer and thinker, dive deep into the complexities of the Ukraine-Russia conflict. They discuss the challenges of U.S.-Russia negotiations and the implications of Trump's potential concessions. The conversation explores NATO's inadequate military aid to Ukraine and its geopolitical repercussions. Additionally, they touch on Canada’s diplomatic ties and the clash between wildlife conservation efforts and human development, shedding light on current global issues.

Claire Fox, Director of the Academy of Ideas and independent peer, joins the hosts to dissect pivotal changes in Syria as the Assad regime falters. They analyze how international influences shape the region and the controversial rebranding of rebel group HTS. The conversation also delves into America's complex responses to violence, including a trial that highlights racial tensions. Finally, they discuss Reform UK's rise against disillusionment with mainstream parties, indicating a shifting political landscape in the UK.

Katy Balls, a sharp political journalist, and Claire Fox, a non-affiliated peer advocating for free speech, engage in a robust discussion about the implications of government responses to recent riots. They explore the challenges of regulating online discussions without infringing on free speech. The duo highlights the pressures on the Labour government to curb misinformation while emphasizing the importance of maintaining open dialogue. Their conversation raises critical questions about the balance between security and civil liberties in a digital age.

Claire Fox, a former Brexit Party MEP and Director of the Academy of Ideas, joins journalist Ella Whelan, known for her insights on social issues. They dive into the importance of reviving open debate in today's polarized landscape, advocating for diverse dialogue over performative conflict. The conversation critiques identity politics, urging a focus on ideas rather than representation quotas. They also emphasize the necessity of empathy and understanding in political discourse, especially for younger generations navigating complex issues.

In this thought-provoking discussion, guests like Giles Fraser, a priest and polemicist, and Melanie Phillips, a social commentator, dive into the moral implications of repatriating cultural artifacts. Claire Fox brings a political angle, while Dr. Tiffany Jenkins argues against repatriation, emphasizing ownership complexities. Former Minister Michael Portillo and Prof. Constantine Sandis explore philosophical aspects, questioning cultural claims. Andrew Dismore shares insights from the frontlines of repatriation efforts, unraveling the intricate ties between history, morality, and ownership of artifacts.