Political correspondents Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman, along with national security correspondent Charlie Savage, discuss the potential consequences of a second Trump presidency, highlighting his radical vision and strategic plans. Topics include his approach to immigration, national security, consolidation of power, control over media and regulatory powers, and his vision for the Department of Justice. They analyze Trump's appeal to supporters, focus on projecting strength, and the impact on American democracy.

Charlie Savage, a national security and legal policy journalist at The Times, explores the implications of Julian Assange's recent conviction, the first of its kind in U.S. history for publishing classified materials. He discusses how this case affects journalism and government accountability, shedding light on the balance between national security and free press rights. Savage dives into the chilling effect on whistleblowers and the ongoing struggles surrounding press freedoms in an era of increasing government surveillance.

Charlie Savage, a Washington correspondent for The New York Times, explains the legal strategy and potential defenses behind the indictment of former President Trump for attempting to subvert the 2020 election. They discuss the charges, the special counsel's approach, and Trump's potential defense centered around the First Amendment. The episode also touches on Yellow's bankruptcy filing and its impact on jobs and the supply chain.

In the week since Donald Trump was arraigned on 34 felony charges, debate about the strength of the case against him has only intensified.Charlie Savage, a Washington correspondent at The Times, has closely studied the case and explains which side he stands on.Guest: Charlie Savage, a Washington correspondent for The New York Times.Background reading: Trump could turn to a familiar legal strategy: attack and delay.Analysis: A surprise accusation bolsters a risky case against Trump.For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Recently, Charlie Savage of the New York Times reported that the Biden administration had finalized a new policy governing drone strikes used in counterterrorism operations outside war zones. The policy tightens up rules established under the Trump administration—which themselves replaced an earlier guidance set out by President Obama. President Biden’s policy is the latest effort to calibrate America’s use of force in a 21st-century conflict outside the traditional battlefield.To talk through Charlie’s reporting, Lawfare senior editor Quinta Jurecic sat down with him and Lawfare cofounder Bobby Chesney, who has closely observed this area of U.S. law and policy. They discussed how U.S. counterterrorism operations have changed in recent years, how Biden’s approach compares to the Obama and Trump policies before it, and the significance of these changes for U.S. counterterrorism going forward. Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.