Brian Nosek

Max Bazerman, a behavioral science expert from Harvard, Leif Nelson from UC Berkeley known for tackling research misconduct, and Brian Nosek, a champion of research integrity at the University of Virginia, explore the alarming rise of academic fraud. They discuss the pressures that lead researchers to manipulate data and the far-reaching consequences of retracted papers. The conversation delves into high-profile cases and their implications on public trust, while emphasizing the urgent need for accountability and ethical standards in academia.

Max Bazerman, a Harvard Business School professor, discusses the ethics of academia, spotlighting the systemic pressures that lead to misconduct. Brian Nosek from the University of Virginia talks about his efforts in promoting transparency through the Open Science Framework, revealing the reluctance in academia to share data. Ivan Oransky, co-founder of Retraction Watch, exposes the challenges surrounding the integrity of publishing, especially after Hindawi's retraction of over 8,000 fraudulent papers. The episode sheds light on the pervasive issues of trust and accountability in research.

Brian Nosek, a pioneering psychologist and co-developer of the Implicit Association Test, discusses the evolution of psychology in light of the replication crisis. He highlights the importance of sample diversity and communication of scientific uncertainty. The conversation delves into the complexities of implicit bias assessment through IAT, advocating for transparent methodologies in research. Nosek also critiques the breakdown of trust in science and emphasizes open science practices to enhance reproducibility, ultimately aiming for a more reliable academic landscape.

Brian Nosek, executive director of the Center for Open Science and a leading voice in the reproducibility movement, dives into the hot-button issue of the replication crisis in psychology. He highlights how much psychological research, particularly around ego depletion, fails replication tests. Nosek discusses publication bias, P-hacking, and the need for reform to bolster trust in science. With a mix of humor and insight, he emphasizes the importance of transparency and the value of questioning our scientific beliefs.

Psychologist tests field of psychology, scientists bet on success-rate, paradoxes of human nature explored. Replication crisis discussed with guest voices, focusing on reproducibility and scientific claims. Challenges of replication studies, questioning research standards and reliability. Impact of multiple comparisons in studies, ethical concerns highlighted. Exploring researcher degrees of freedom and philosophical debates in scientific research.