Brian Nosek

Max Bazerman, a behavioral science expert from Harvard, Leif Nelson from UC Berkeley known for tackling research misconduct, and Brian Nosek, a champion of research integrity at the University of Virginia, explore the alarming rise of academic fraud. They discuss the pressures that lead researchers to manipulate data and the far-reaching consequences of retracted papers. The conversation delves into high-profile cases and their implications on public trust, while emphasizing the urgent need for accountability and ethical standards in academia.

Max Bazerman, a Harvard Business School professor, discusses the ethics of academia, spotlighting the systemic pressures that lead to misconduct. Brian Nosek from the University of Virginia talks about his efforts in promoting transparency through the Open Science Framework, revealing the reluctance in academia to share data. Ivan Oransky, co-founder of Retraction Watch, exposes the challenges surrounding the integrity of publishing, especially after Hindawi's retraction of over 8,000 fraudulent papers. The episode sheds light on the pervasive issues of trust and accountability in research.

Brian Nosek, a pioneering psychologist and co-developer of the Implicit Association Test, discusses the evolution of psychology in light of the replication crisis. He highlights the importance of sample diversity and communication of scientific uncertainty. The conversation delves into the complexities of implicit bias assessment through IAT, advocating for transparent methodologies in research. Nosek also critiques the breakdown of trust in science and emphasizes open science practices to enhance reproducibility, ultimately aiming for a more reliable academic landscape.

Psychologist tests field of psychology, scientists bet on success-rate, paradoxes of human nature explored. Replication crisis discussed with guest voices, focusing on reproducibility and scientific claims. Challenges of replication studies, questioning research standards and reliability. Impact of multiple comparisons in studies, ethical concerns highlighted. Exploring researcher degrees of freedom and philosophical debates in scientific research.

In this episode, we show how you can decode scientific studies and spot bad science by digging deep into the tools and skills you need to be an educated consumer of scientific information. Are you tired of seeing seemingly outrageous studies published in the news, only to see the exact opposite published a week later? What makes scientific research useful and valid? How can you, as a non-scientist, read and understand scientific information in a simple and straightforward way that can help you get closer to the truth - and apply those lessons to your life. We discuss this and much more with Dr. Brian Nosek. Dr. Brian Nosek is the co-founder and Executive Director of the Center for Open Science and a professor of psychology at the University of Virginia. Brian led the reproducibility project which involved leading some 270 of his peers to reproduce 100 published psychology studies to see if they could reproduce the results. This work shed light on some of the publication bias in the science of psychology and much more.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.