Brian Kalt

Brian Kalt, a law professor and author, teams up with Jeffrey Toobin, a legal analyst and seasoned author, to delve into the complexities of presidential pardon power. They discuss the founders’ intentions, exploring the legitimacy of self-pardons and the evolving nature of clemency through American history. Topics include the controversial Nixon pardon, the implications of modern pardons issued by Biden and Trump, and the tension between accountability and presidential immunity, providing a thought-provoking look at the balance of power in governance.

Last November, President Trump became candidate Trump when he formally announced his campaign to retake the White House in 2024. And when, earlier this month, the Department of Justice indicted Trump over his unauthorized possession of classified documents, it gave him another title: defendant Trump.How will all of these roles interact with each other on a legal and logistical level? How will the obligations of defendant Trump interfere with candidate Trump's ability to conduct his presidential campaign? And if candidate Trump becomes convicted-felon Trump and also President Trump, what then?To think through these issues, Alan Rozenshtein, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Minnesota and Senior Editor at Lawfare, spoke with two members of the Lawfare extended universe: Stephanie Pell, Lawfare Senior Editor and a former federal prosecutor in the southern district of Florida, and Brian Kalt, a law professor at Michigan State and one of the foremost experts on presidential disqualification and removal.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Brian Kalt, a law professor at Michigan State University, uncovers a shocking legal loophole in Yellowstone National Park known as the 'zone of death.' He recounts Mike Belderrain’s harrowing elk hunting experience that leads to bizarre constitutional dilemmas, revealing how someone could theoretically evade prosecution for murder. The discussion dives into the importance of addressing such legal gaps, intertwining legal theory with real-life implications, while reflecting on moral accountability in actions like hunting and the urgent need for legislative reform.