

Ben Pace
Author of the essay '7 Vicious Vices of Rationalists' published on LessWrong; writes and speaks about rationality, social norms, and community epistemics.
Top 3 podcasts with Ben Pace
Ranked by the Snipd community

14 snips
Nov 17, 2025 • 10min
“7 Vicious Vices of Rationalists” by Ben Pace
Ben Pace, author and thinker on rationality, dives into the intriguing world of rationalist vices. He explores how contrarianism, while useful, can turn into mere contrariness. Pace highlights the pitfalls of pedantry in conversation and warns against excessive elaboration wasting time. He talks about social obliviousness, which can backfire in discussions, and the limits of assuming good faith amidst potential bad actors. Finally, he emphasizes the destructive nature of constantly resisting social momentum, impacting relationships and community dynamics.

7 snips
Feb 16, 2025 • 9min
“The Failed Strategy of Artificial Intelligence Doomers” by Ben Pace
In this discussion, Ben Pace, an author and analyst, explores the sociological dynamics of the AI x-risk reduction movement. He critiques the regulatory strategies of the AI Doomers, arguing their approach could impede beneficial advancements in AI. Pace analyzes the rise of fears surrounding superintelligent machines and the ideological rifts within the coalition opposing AI development. He emphasizes the need for more effective communication regarding AI safety concerns amid growing public attention.

Jun 25, 2025 • 58min
240 – How To Live Well With High P(Doom) – with Ben Pace, Brandon Hendrickson, Miranda Dixon-Luinenburg
Join Ben Pace, owner of Science is Weird, known for his innovative education models; Brandon Hendrickson, a 2023 book contest winner; and Miranda Dixon-Luinenburg, a resilient advocate working for Lightcone after facing high P(Doom). They discuss living well amid existential threats, the role of mortality in meaningful living, and the importance of community connections. The conversation dives into balancing joy and creativity with life's uncertainties while addressing how personal choices can shape our responses to potential doom.


