Anupam Chander

Anupam Chander, a law professor at Georgetown, is an expert on global internet regulation. He dives into how the web's growth is shaping politics and speech worldwide. The conversation sheds light on Brazil's user-centric regulatory approach versus South Korea's balanced system. Chander discusses the complexities of online speech laws like Section 230 and the potential dangers of internet regulations, particularly concerning anonymity for vulnerable populations. The episode also highlights the influence of U.S. tech laws on international policies.

Anupam Chander, a Georgetown Law professor specializing in global tech regulation, joins David Rothkopf to discuss the pressing challenges of artificial intelligence regulation. They analyze how the upcoming U.S. administration may shape AI policy and the competitive landscape with China. Chander highlights the importance of multilateral cooperation in AI governance, particularly in addressing global security risks and data sovereignty issues. The conversation uncovers the potential for international tension as nations navigate their distinct regulatory frameworks.

Law professor, Anupam Chander, discusses the implications of US policy changes on TikTok, potential legal battles, global tech regulations, internet governance, national security risks, foreign investments, data privacy issues, and the challenges faced by the US government in defending its actions.

In this insightful discussion, Alan Rozenshtein, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, Anupam Chander from Georgetown, and Mary-Rose Papandrea of the University of North Carolina dive into the D.C. Circuit Court's ruling on TikTok. They dissect the legal complexities surrounding the app, particularly its First Amendment implications and national security concerns tied to its Chinese ownership. The conversation also critiques the government's rationale about data privacy, showcasing the ongoing tension between digital innovation and regulatory scrutiny.

Anupam Chander, Kyle Langvhardt, and Alan Rozenshtein discuss the Supreme Court's decision in Moody v. NetChoice, exploring implications for content moderation, state regulation, and First Amendment principles. The conversation delves into complex opinions, concurrences by Justices Barrett, Jackson, Thomas, and Alito, and speculates on future outcomes. They analyze laws impacting platforms, algorithmic content moderation, and balancing speech interests online.