Andrew Branca

Tiffany Cianci, a small business advocate and congressional testimony regular, joins Angry Cops, a Buffalo detective and comedic YouTuber, alongside attorney Andrew Branca. They dive into the Trump administration's hints of criminal charges against Anthony Fauci and debate the implications of COVID-19 policies on child development. The guests share insights on the legalities of presidential pardons, domestic violence within gang contexts, and societal impacts of political maneuvering. Their dynamic banter also touches on generational divides and wealth inequality.

In this discussion, Andrew Branca, an attorney specializing in self-defense law, Richard Hy, a Buffalo detective and YouTuber, and Jacob Wells, co-founder of a fundraising platform, delve into the complex legalities surrounding the Carmelo Anthony case. They explore the nuances of self-defense laws and the challenges posed by public perception and jury selection in high-profile trials. The trio tackles media influence, societal pressures, and the implications of fundraising for controversial legal battles, shedding light on the intersections of law, ethics, and public sentiment.

Andrew Branca, a self-defense attorney with three decades of experience and author of "Law of Self Defense," dives deep into current gun laws in the U.S. He discusses the vital concepts of Castle Doctrine and Duty to Retreat, unraveling the emotional vs. legal reasoning in use-of-force events. The conversation also touches on the complexities of self-defense law, emphasizing the importance of understanding legal repercussions. Listeners gain invaluable insights into navigating the treacherous waters of self-defense with real-life examples and tactical decision-making guidance.

Andrew Branca, an attorney and author specializing in self-defense law, joins to clarify when the use of force is legally justified. He dispels common myths surrounding self-defense, explains the differences between civil and criminal cases, and outlines the five essential conditions for lawful defense. The conversation also covers the principle of proportionality, emphasizing that the force used must match the threat. Listeners learn about the importance of understanding legal implications in heated situations, ensuring they navigate self-defense scenarios wisely.

Join legal minds Andrew Branca, a self-defense expert, Ronnie Richter, a lawyer for Murdaugh's victims, and Peter Tragos, a YouTube host, as they dissect the gripping details of the Murdaugh trial, including key evidence that led to his conviction. They analyze the judge's powerful moment and speculate on the defense's appeal. Meanwhile, Jeremy Peters from The New York Times and former First Amendment lawyer George Freeman delve into the complex realm of the Dominion-Fox News lawsuit, discussing media ethics, defamation challenges, and the responsibility of truth in journalism.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford Health Policy Professor known for his COVID-19 critiques, joins Olympic gold medalist Nancy Hogshead-Makar to tackle pressing societal issues. They discuss the government's shifting COVID narrative and the need for balanced public health strategies. The conversation moves to the contentious topic of transgender athletes in women's sports, emphasizing fairness for cisgender females. They also analyze the Kim Potter trial's verdict, debating the legal complexities of self-defense and public trust in the justice system.

Allie Beth Stuckey, a conservative commentator, Andrew Branca, a self-defense expert, and Kyle Warner, a pro mountain biker who experienced severe vaccine side effects, delve into pressing social issues. They tackle the fallout of social justice policies, the rise in crime rates amid progressive reforms, and the complexities of legal accountability in high-profile trials. Warner shares his personal struggle post-vaccination, emphasizing the need for transparent conversations about vaccine safety. Their candid discussions illuminate critical societal dynamics and challenges facing today's youth.

Glenn Greenwald, a renowned journalist, joins self-defense attorney Andrew Branca, defense attorney Mark Eiglarsh, and Law&Crime reporter Angenette Levy in a riveting discussion about the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. They dive into the controversies surrounding jury deliberations, the complexities of self-defense law, and the often misleading media narratives. Tensions rise as they explore the verdict's implications for society, the role of ethics in reporting, and the responsibility of public figures in shaping public perception. It's a thought-provoking dialogue on law, media, and justice.

Joining the conversation are Chris Christie, former New Jersey Governor and political strategist, Robert Barnes, Rittenhouse's ex-civil attorney, Andrew Branca, self-defense legal expert, and Richard Baris, polling director. They delve into the Rittenhouse trial's jury deliberations and implications of media misrepresentation. Discussions include the prospect of a mistrial, jury dynamics influenced by public opinion, and the Republican Party's communication challenges amidst a shifting political landscape. Legal insights and polling predictions round out an engaging dialogue on justice and politics.

Robert Barnes, a founding attorney and former civil lawyer for Kyle Rittenhouse, joins legal experts Dave Aronberg and Andrew Branca to dissect the Rittenhouse trial. They delve into self-defense arguments, the complexities of jury deliberation, and the pivotal role of key witnesses. Harmeet Dhillon discusses the controversial FBI raid on journalist James O'Keefe, raising important questions about press freedoms and government overreach. The conversation highlights the intersection of law, media, and public perception in high-stakes cases.