Teaser: Episode 115: Free Download Norton Anti Imperialism (Ft. Ben Norton)
Jan 22, 2024
07:36
auto_awesome Snipd AI
Ben Norton, Expert on imperialism, discusses the likelihood of Israel facing consequences in the International Court, the potential influence of the US on the verdict, biases within the ICJ, and the imbalance of power in the UN Security Council.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
There is significant pressure from the United States on the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to rule against proceedings, highlighting the lack of complete independence.
Implementing ICJ rulings can be challenging due to the power of veto held by countries like the US in the UN Security Council, creating potential barriers for justice.
Deep dives
Composition of the International Court of Justice
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) consists of 15 judges from different countries, including the United States, Germany, France, Australia, India, Japan, and Slovakia. These countries, along with their allies, are part of the ICJ. While the judges are technically independent on paper, there is significant pressure from the United States to rule against the proceedings. However, other members of the ICJ, such as Brazil, China, Russia, Morocco, Uganda, Somalia, Lebanon, and Jamaica, may provide a more neutral stance.
Historical Precedents and Challenges
There are two important historical precedents to consider. In 2004, the ICJ ruled that Israel's construction of the apartheid wall in the occupied West Bank was illegal and had to be destroyed. However, Israel ignored this ruling, with the US judge being the only one in support of Israel. Another precedent is Nicaragua's case against the US in the 1980s, where the ICJ ruled that the US had committed war crimes and aggression. Despite the ruling, the US vetoed any consequences or reparations. These precedents highlight the challenges in implementing ICJ rulings, as they require approval from the UN Security Council where veto power lies with countries like the US, creating potential barriers for justice.
1.
The Likelihood of Israel Facing Consequences and The Political Nature of the International Court