Marc Schuilenburg, "Hysteria: Crime, Media, and Politics" (Routledge, 2021)
Dec 29, 2024
auto_awesome
Marc Schuilenburg, a criminology professor at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, explores the pervasive nature of hysteria in modern society. He discusses how media shapes our fears surrounding crime and safety, framing public reactions historically linked to women's issues. By examining consumer behavior, he highlights the exaggerated responses to crises like pandemics and immigration. Schuilenburg argues that this cultural hysteria may hinder community engagement but can also serve as a catalyst for social change.
Hysteria has evolved from a historical medical diagnosis into a pervasive societal phenomenon fueled by emotional responses to crises like COVID-19.
While often seen negatively, expressions of hysteria can mobilize collective action and drive social change, especially regarding issues like gender equality.
Deep dives
The Hysteria Phenomenon
Hysteria, a term historically associated with women's emotional expressions, has transcended its medical origins to represent broader societal emotions. The dismissal of hysteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders (DSM) in the late 1980s highlighted its stigma and the shift towards evidence-based approaches in psychology. Despite its medical erasure, contemporary society is rife with manifestations of hysteria, particularly observed during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic and other moments of social tension. This shift requires a sociological analysis, revealing that the underlying frustrations often stem from societal changes, even as public perception remains steeped in emotional responsiveness.
Historical Context of Hysteria
The historical interpretations of hysteria date back to ancient civilizations that linked it to the wandering womb, illustrating a long-standing view of female emotionality as inherently irrational. This ancient concept evolved through eras, with prominent figures like Freud characterizing hysteria as a manifestation of repressed psychological conflicts. However, as societal understanding advanced, the notion of hysteria transformed into a collective phenomenon observable in modern political rhetoric and media, signaling a trend of exaggerated emotional behavior. Analyzing historical and current expressions of hysteria offers insights into its continued relevance in everyday discourse, influenced by cultural artifacts in literature, film, and art.
Hysteria in Public Discourse
Public discourse frequently reflects hysterical responses toward issues of security and safety, often exaggerating risks while ignoring statistics that suggest declining crime rates. Politicians employ language reminiscent of war when discussing public safety, which fosters a sense of hysteria rather than rationality. This discrepancy highlights a societal failure to recognize genuine safety while amplifying fears, driven in part by media narratives that prioritize sensationalism over fact. The resulting environment perpetuates a culture of hysteria, one that prioritizes emotional reactions over informed discussions around security and trust in public policy.
The Potential for Positive Hysteria
While hysteria is often viewed negatively, it also possesses the potential to catalyze social change and mobilize collective action. Historical instances of collective hysteria have led to significant reforms, particularly concerning gender equality and civil rights, indicating that such emotional surges can serve a constructive purpose. Current societal frustrations, visible in demographic movements and political activism, can be rechanneled from hysteria into a force that advocates for change and social justice. Redirecting this energy towards constructive dialogue and policy-making potentially transforms hysteria from a mere emotional response into a platform for collective empowerment and improvement.
According to the medical world, hysteria is a thing of the past, an outdated diagnosis that has disappeared for good. Hysteria: Crime, Media, and Politics(Routledge, 2021) argues that hysteria is in fact alive and well.
Hyperventilating, we rush from one incident into the next - there is hardly time for a breather. From the worldwide run on toilet paper to cope with coronavirus fears to the overheated discussions about immigration and overwrought reactions to the levels of crime and disorder around us, we live in a culture of hysteria. While hysteria is typically discussed in emotional terms - as an obstacle to be overcome - it nevertheless has very real consequences in everyday life. Irritating though this may be, hysteria needs to be taken seriously, for what it tells us about our society and way of life. That is why Marc Schuilenburg examines what hysteria is and why it is fuelled by a culture that not only abuses, but also encourages and rewards it.
Written in a clear and direct style, this book will appeal to students and scholars of sociology, criminology, philosophy and all those interested in hysteria and how it permeates late modern society.
Geert Slabbekoorn works as an analyst in the field of public security. In addition he has published on different aspects of dark web drug trade in Belgium. Find him on twitter, tweeting all things drug related @GeertJS.