The DSR Network Siliconsciousness: Trump, AI and the Big Choices We Face in the Very Near Future
Dec 19, 2025
Adam Conner, a policy expert at the Center for American Progress, joins to discuss the implications of the Trump administration's AI executive order. He argues that this order could undermine state regulations and empower big tech, posing legal and constitutional challenges. The conversation dives into the economic stakes of AI, the need for clear accountability measures, and the risks of relying too heavily on AI for decision-making. Conner also emphasizes the importance of steering AI development towards inclusive growth and fostering public debate on its future.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Executive Order As Political Signaling
- The Trump executive order on AI is primarily a power play to court Silicon Valley and reduce perceived regulatory friction.
- Adam Conner says it signals an AI accelerationist agenda that privileges rapid development over careful governance.
The Failed Federal Moratorium Push
- Industry sought a federal moratorium to block state AI laws, proposing a ten-year pause and nullification of existing rules.
- Conner explains that attempt failed amid bipartisan backlash and was removed from major bills.
EO As Intimidation, Not Legal Preemption
- The executive order functions as an intimidation and power-grab more than a lawful preemption tool.
- Conner warns it attempts to chill state policymaking and could be unconstitutional and coercive.