The recent BRICS summit in Kazan is a key focus, revealing Putin's attempts to reshape Russia's global image while showcasing the transactional nature of alliances with nations like China and Iran. The discussion touches on Russia's complex political landscape, drawing parallels with past decades of instability, crime, and mysticism. Economic challenges are explored, especially in light of recent interest rates and the ongoing impact of the Ukraine conflict. The analysis concludes with reflections on modern governance's stagnation, reminiscent of historical socio-political declines.
39:08
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
The BRICS summit in Kazan highlighted Russia's transactional relationships within the coalition, emphasizing national interests over collective solidarity.
Historical comparisons of Russia's current state reflect a stable yet challenged regime, distinct from the chaotic collapse of the 1990s.
Deep dives
The Nature and Composition of BRICS
BRICS, originally comprising Brazil, Russia, India, and China, has expanded to include new members like South Africa, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the UAE. The group functions more as a loose coalition rather than a unified bloc, often convening to discuss trade and geopolitics. The recent summit in Kazan highlighted the multicultural and multi-ethnic aspects of Russia, showcasing its regional strengths. Within this context, the perception of BRICS varies, with some leaders viewing it as an alternative to Western influence, while others remain cautious due to differing national agendas.
Putin's Propaganda and the BRICS Summit
The BRICS summit in Kazan was seen as a strategic victory for Putin, who engaged with various world leaders, including controversial figures like UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres. This summit marked a contrast to the previous year when he had to avoid appearing in South Africa due to an International Criminal Court warrant. Putin's vision for BRICS is one of an alternative global order, promoting the idea of de-dollarization and independence from Western financial systems. However, skepticism surrounds the claims of new member interest and the group's effectiveness in achieving true multipolarity.
Transactional Relationships within BRICS
While BRICS represents a growing coalition of nations, the relationships among its members are highly transactional, often driven by individual national interests. Notably, China plays a dominant role, with its interests sometimes conflicting with those of Russia, evident in their divergent strategies regarding Western relations. Countries like India have shown a preference for a negotiated resolution to the Ukraine conflict, indicating limited allegiance to Russia's goals. This situation underscores that collaboration among BRICS countries often occurs in the context of economic pragmatism rather than solidarity.
Historical Parallels and Russia's Current State
The discussion around Russia's current state has led to comparisons with historical periods, particularly the chaotic 1990s, but the stability of the current regime reflects a different reality. While there's a rise in crime and other societal issues reminiscent of the past, the government remains intact and operational. This contrasts with the 1990s when state authority was collapsing, paving the way for leaders like Putin to emerge. Observers posit that today’s Russia resembles more of a late czarist model, with an active state managing its affairs amid internal and external challenges without immediate signs of collapse.
(It seems to be obligatory to use a weak BRICS/bricks pun, so I felt I had to follow...)
The BRICS summit in Kazan (a smart place to hold it) gives all the appearances of being a propaganda win for Putin. However, I think it emphasised that in a new 'multipolar' world, he only has the friends he can afford to rent -- and some day the bill will become due.
In the second half, I question whether Russia is genuinely falling back into the 'wild 90s'. Perhaps the 'stagnant 70s'? Or the 'decaying 80s'? Or -- my favourite -- the 'braindead 10s'. Either way, these historical parallels should be considered no more than thought laboratories.
The podcast's corporate partner and sponsor is Conducttr, which provides software for innovative and immersive crisis exercises in hybrid warfare, counter-terrorism, civil affairs and similar situations.
You can also follow my blog, In Moscow's Shadows, and become one of the podcast's supporting Patrons and gain question-asking rights and access to exclusive extra materials including the (almost-) weekly Govorit Moskva news briefing right here.