Trump's Terms Special counsel Jack Smith says evidence against Trump was enough to convict him
6 snips
Jan 14, 2025 The investigation into Donald Trump's post-2020 election actions raises questions about accountability and bias in legal proceedings. A pivotal report suggests evidence could have led to Trump's conviction if not for his electoral victory. Discussions highlight the implications of the January 6 events and ongoing civil lawsuits. The podcast also unveils the details of felony charges against Trump, probing the prosecutor's stance amid political backlash and hinting at potential future investigations in an ever-evolving political landscape.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Smith's Report on Trump
- Special Counsel Jack Smith won't pursue criminal charges against President-elect Trump.
- Smith's report asserts enough evidence existed for a conviction, if not for Trump's election victory.
Report's Significance
- Jack Smith's report is now public, offering potential accountability for those affected by January 6th.
- The report serves as a historical record amidst ongoing election fraud claims.
Report Release Battle
- Trump's attempts to block the report's release failed.
- The Supreme Court's ruling on Trump's immunity and delays contributed to the timing.