Undercurrents MSNBC’s shameful reaction to Charlie Kirk’s killing
Sep 11, 2025
The podcast dives into the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk and critiques the biased media response, particularly from MSNBC. It raises concerns about the influence of social media on political discourse, showcasing the divide in coverage. The discussion also touches on Kirk's legacy and how his tragic death affects young audiences. Ultimately, it emphasizes the need for open debate and responsible journalism in a time of escalating political violence.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Bifurcated Media Reaction
- Emily Jashinsky highlights a stark split in media reactions to Charlie Kirk's assassination.
- She finds MSNBC's breaking coverage especially callous and shocking compared with other public condemnations.
Live Coverage Went Too Far
- Emily recounts how MSNBC anchors speculated and blamed quickly during live breaking coverage.
- She describes Matthew Dowd's remarks and Katie Tur's handling as shameful and irresponsible in the immediate aftermath.
Human Responses Versus Network Tone
- Jashinsky contrasts emotional, humane left-wing reactions with what she calls dehumanizing tones on MSNBC.
- She emphasizes that some left commentators showed horror and grief, unlike the network's on-air tone.