
The Michael Shermer Show How AI Sees Science Differently Than We Do
Order Shapes Scientific Understanding
- Chris Edwards argues scientific history is a permutation where discovery order matters and shapes understanding.
- Reordering emphasis (entropy first) could make science more coherent and AI-friendly.
Energy As A Form Of Entropy
- Edwards reframes energy as a species of entropy: order is temporary capture of decay.
- This view connects heat, radiation and probabilities across disciplines for clearer narratives.
What If Decay Came First?
- If decay had been central, models could emphasize cooling and instability rather than motion first.
- That perspective links temperature, probability and why the universe isn't at absolute zero.





































What if the great discoveries of science came in the "wrong" order? The Laws of Thermodynamics were discovered well after the creation of algebra, classical physics, and chemistry, but are perhaps much more important to our basic understanding of the universe.
Chris Edwards argues that AI will be able to understand science outside of the traditional chronological developments of the sciences, unlocking entirely new potentials and perspectives on the universe. If human scholars are to understand how AI interprets the universe, we will first need to understand the scientific narrative in a "new order."
Chris Edwards teaches history, English, and mathematics at a public school in the Midwest. He is a frequent contributor to Skeptic magazine and the author of Thought Experiments: History and Applications for Education, Beyond Obsolete: How to Upgrade Classroom Practice and School Structure, Femocracy: How Educators Can Teach Democratic Ideals and Feminism, and most recently of The New Order: How AI Rewrites the Narrative of Science. His background is in world history.
