

OMG! MAGA Mike Accidentally Incriminates Trump for Dark Past
Sep 6, 2025
Michael Wolff, a former biographer of Donald Trump and an almost biographer of Jeffrey Epstein, shares fascinating insights in this conversation. He highlights MAGA Mike's inadvertent hints at incriminating details about Trump. The discussion dives deep into the troubling ties between Trump and Epstein, raising eyebrows over questionable real estate transactions and suspicious associations. Wolff also explores inconsistencies in Trump’s statements, painting a complex picture of their fraught relationship that hints at larger implications in the political landscape.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Trump May Have Informed To Protect Himself
- Ben Meiselas links Mike Johnson's comments to Michael Wolff's claim that Trump may have informed on Epstein to protect himself.
- This frames the possibility that Trump wasn't a hero informant but may have acted to limit exposure of his own ties.
Demand Documentation, Not Talking Points
- Scrutinize claims that political figures 'exposed' crimes; ask who benefits from framing someone as an informant.
- Demand full documentation rather than relying on politicians' statements when assessing such allegations.
Why Trump Wouldn't Hide Hero Evidence
- Ben Meiselas challenges MAGA Mike Johnson's claim that Trump was an FBI informant who exposed Epstein.
- He argues that if Trump were a heroic informant, Trump would welcome release of files proving it, but instead seeks redactions.