Peter Mandler, "The Crisis of the Meritocracy: Britain's Transition to Mass Education Since the Second World War" (Oxford UP, 2020)
Jan 6, 2025
auto_awesome
Peter Mandler, a Professor of Modern Cultural History at the University of Cambridge, discusses his book, focusing on Britain's shift to mass education post-World War II. He explores how public demand for accessible education dramatically shaped policy, the tension between meritocracy and democracy, and the impact of grassroots movements on educational reforms. Mandler highlights the myths surrounding social mobility through education, urging caution about its power to address inequality while celebrating the push for quality education for all.
The historical shift in Britain's education system illustrates how democratic ideals increasingly challenged the traditional meritocratic model post-World War II.
Despite advancements in access to education, systemic inequalities persist, necessitating broader social reforms beyond educational improvements to achieve true equity.
Deep dives
The Crisis of Meritocracy in Education
Meritocracy's historical context reveals a belief that only a select few can benefit from higher education, leading to a system that primarily provides basic education for the majority. This understanding of education has shifted since the Second World War, as democratic ideals began to challenge the notion that education should exclusively serve an elite. The post-war democratic movement advocated for high-quality education for all, arguing that every individual should have the opportunity to access the best educational resources without being sorted into categories based on test results. This tension between meritocracy and democracy fundamentally reshaped the education landscape in Britain, making it a central theme in contemporary discussions about educational equity.
Transformation of the Education System Post-War
Before the Second World War, education was limited, with only a small percentage of students receiving secondary education based on exam performance at age 11. Following the war, the Butler Act established the principle of secondary education for all, which aimed to create a more uniform system, but in practice resulted in a fragmented educational landscape. Most local authorities continued to maintain grammar schools for the fortunate few while leaving a majority in secondary modern schools without a clear educational goal. This disparity highlighted the challenges of achieving a truly comprehensive education system, which many advocated for in the context of growing public demand for educational improvement.
Public Demand for Comprehensive Schools
The call for comprehensive schools emerged from a widespread recognition that the existing system was exclusionary, particularly after the baby boom led to rising expectations from parents and children alike. The perception that grammar schools provided the best education fueled resentment among working-class families who could not access these schools due to the 11-plus exam. By the late 1950s, a strong push from parents for their children to receive equitable education culminated in the demand for comprehensive schools that eliminated the elitist selection process. This movement was not merely a top-down decision but rather a grassroots push driven by an evolving public sentiment that education should be accessible to all, irrespective of early academic performance.
Inequality Beyond Education: Broader Implications
Despite democratic advancements in education, evidence suggests that providing equal educational opportunities alone does not significantly reduce social inequality or enhance social mobility. Additional factors outside the education system, such as labor market dynamics and family support, exert a more substantial influence on one's economic mobility. The concept of a 'race between democracy and education' indicates that while increased access to education raises overall standards, the privileged often benefit more, perpetuating existing inequalities. Therefore, achieving true equality requires addressing social and economic disparities comprehensively, rather than solely focusing on educational reforms, emphasizing the complexity of achieving equitable social outcomes.
How did public demand shape education in the 20th century? In The Crisis of the Meritocracy: Britain’s Transition to Mass Education since the Second World War (Oxford UP, 2020), Peter Mandler, Professor of Modern Cultural History at the University of Cambridge, charts the history of schools, colleges, and universities. The book charts the tension between demands for democracy and the defence of meritocracy within both elite and public discourses, showing how this tension plays out in Britain’s complex and fragmented education system. Offering an alternative vision to the popular memory and perception of education, a note of caution about the power of education to cure social inequalities, and a celebration of public demand for high quality education for all, the book is essential reading across the humanities, social sciences, and for anyone interested in understanding education in contemporary society.