Word & Table Depictions of the Trinity
Dec 23, 2025
Fr. Stephen Gauthier, Canon Theologian and Director of Formation, shares his insights on the rich tradition of depicting the Trinity in church art. He explores the distinction made at Nicaea II between authentic icons and idols, and the fascinating representation of the Trinity in Genesis 18. Fr. Gauthier delves into Rublev's iconic depiction, discussing themes of unity and relationality. He also tackles alternative images and the risks of abstract symbols, emphasizing the importance of both theological and economic representations that reflect God's inner life and His work toward humanity.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Why Images Became Theologically Acceptable
- Nicaea II distinguished true images (icon) from false images (eidolon).
- The incarnation made a true image of God possible because the Son is the visible image of the Father.
Genesis 18 As The Old Testament Trinity
- Orthodox tradition reads Genesis 18 (Abraham and the three visitors) as an Old Testament manifestation of the Trinity.
- That scene became the preferred biblical model for depicting the Trinity in icons.
Rublev's Circle Of Relational Unity
- Andrei Rublev's icon models both unity and relationality among the Persons by placing them in a continuous circle.
- The icon emphasizes coequality and invitation into the Trinity rather than physical likeness.