Delve into the controversies surrounding IQ, sparked by a playful Twitter exchange between a VP and a political podcaster. Explore the societal implications of IQ testing, its critiques, and how intelligence correlates with life outcomes and longevity. Discover studies revealing that a higher IQ might lead to a longer life. The podcast also humorously examines misconceptions about intelligence, mental health, and the Dunning-Kruger effect, urging listeners to rethink how we measure and value cognitive abilities.
The podcast examines the controversy surrounding IQ by highlighting JD Vance's tweet questioning Rory Stewart's intelligence and its broader implications on self-assessment.
Hosts challenge the validity of IQ as a measure of worth, citing research that both supports and critiques its importance in societal discussions.
A meta-analysis presented in the episode finds a link between higher IQ scores and longer lifespans, emphasizing the role of intelligence in health decisions.
Deep dives
The Podcast Hosts' Preferences
The hosts discuss their favorite podcasts, highlighting 'The Rest Is Politics' as a notable mention in the UK. One host humorously recalls criticizing Rory Stewart, one of its hosts, referring to him as the 'drippy one.' They reflect on their recurring podcast introductions, indicating that they have frequently touched on the topic of podcast preferences before. This light-hearted banter sets the tone for the rest of the episode.
IQ and Elite Failure
The episode discusses a recent controversy involving JD Vance, who publicly questioned Rory Stewart's IQ and alleged that false arrogance among elites leads to failures. This commentary is connected to broader discussions about self-assessment and understanding one's own intelligence. The hosts challenge the credibility of making IQ claims without substantive support, emphasizing the importance of research and factual correctness. They also caution against the pitfalls of attacking others' intelligence without clear evidence.
Controversial Views on IQ Research
The hosts explore differing perspectives on the relevance and implications of IQ studies in society. They point out the extreme views surrounding IQ—some argue it is the definitive measure of human worth while others dismiss it entirely as a metric influenced by bias. They recount their own experiences with the psychological literature, noting both the merits and flaws in how intelligence is framed in societal discussions. This examination illustrates the contentious nature of IQ research and its implications for understanding human capability and opportunity.
Effects of IQ on Lifespan and Decision-Making
Research indicating a correlation between higher IQ scores and longer lifespans is discussed, with one meta-analysis revealing that a 15-point increase in IQ is associated with over a 20% increase in longevity. The hosts emphasize that intelligence may enable better decision-making and lifestyle choices that contribute to health. Various studies are referenced to support the argument that smarter individuals often make healthier life choices, leading to better outcomes in life. This statistic underscores the far-reaching implications of intelligence beyond academic achievements.
The Complexity of Self-Assessment of IQ
The hosts delve into the complexities of self-perception regarding intelligence, discussing the Dunning-Kruger effect and its implications for understanding self-assessment inaccuracies. They highlight research showing that individuals with below-average IQ scores often overestimate their intelligence, while those with higher IQs may downplay their own abilities. Statistical artifacts often complicate interpretations of intelligence perception and underscore the challenges in measuring and valuing intelligence accurately. This conversation reveals the necessity for more nuanced understandings of how people evaluate their cognitive capabilities.
Every so often there’s a controversy related to IQ. The latest was caused by [checks notes] the new Vice President of the US attacking the IQ of a political podcaster on Twitter.
You could argue that the VP should have better things to be doing. But Tom and Stuart certainly don’t, because they’ve recorded a whole episode of The Studies Show on the science of IQ. Hasn’t IQ been debunked as a measure? Does anyone take it seriously in 2025? Doesn’t an IQ test only tell you how good you are at doing IQ tests? In this episode, find out the answers to all these questions and more.
The Studies Show is sponsored by Works in Progress magazine. It’s an online magazine associated with the broad “progress studies” movement, where you can find excellent, data-driven essays on what works to drive scientific and technological advances. You can find every issue of the magazine, for free, at worksinprogress.co.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.thestudiesshowpod.com/subscribe
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
