Judging Freedom π΄ π£ [SPECIAL] TRUMP BOMBS IRAN! w/ Scott Ritter and Judge Napolitano
Jun 22, 2025
Join Scott Ritter, a former Marine Corps intelligence officer and UN weapons inspector, as he dives into the controversial U.S. military strikes against Iran. Ritter critiques these actions as illegal and outlines the constitutional implications of war powers. He discusses the pre-planned nature of these attacks and assesses recent military operations involving Israel, deeming them unjustified. The conversation highlights the potential risks for American service members and calls for greater congressional oversight on military engagements.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Unconstitutional Iran Attack
- President Trump's attack on Iran was unconstitutional and illegal under U.S. law and international law.
- Only Congress can declare war, and the White House must notify Congress under the War Powers Resolution before military actions.
Empty Strike, No Justification
- The U.S. military strike on Iran was a pre-planned war of aggression lacking legitimate military justification.
- Targets were empty and attacks were theatrical, wasting resources and adding no strategic value.
Failed Nuclear Site Strikes
- Attacks on Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites failed to destroy critical Iran nuclear assets.
- Facilities were evacuated or deeply protected, making the strikes militarily ineffective.