The 1798 Law Inspiring Trump’s Mass Deportation Dreams
Oct 26, 2024
auto_awesome
Katherine Yon Ebright, a counsel in the Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program, dives into the chilling revival of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. She discusses how this historic law is being cited by Trump and right-wing groups to justify mass deportations and bypass due process. Ebright emphasizes the dangerous implications for civil liberties, the misuse of legal rhetoric, and the potential for a surveillance state. Her insights underscore the need for vigilance against the abuse of power that can stem from outdated legal frameworks.
The Alien Enemies Act of 1798, originally a wartime measure, poses significant risks of abuse for mass deportations in contemporary politics.
Current political rhetoric framing migrants as invaders could lead to legal overreach, threatening civil liberties and due process for non-citizens.
Deep dives
Concerns Surrounding the Alien Enemies Act
The Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a remnant of the Alien and Sedition Acts, poses significant concerns regarding its potential use in modern contexts. The Act permits the government to detain and deport non-citizens from nations with which the U.S. is at war. In the hands of a future Trump administration, this could lead to mass deportations of individuals categorized as threats without requiring evidence of wrongdoing. This raises alarm about the potential for legal overreach and the erasure of civil liberties, as the Act could be invoked under the guise of national security.
Historical Context of the Alien Enemies Act
The historical context of the Alien Enemies Act reveals its origin during a time of tense relations with France, aimed at enabling swift action against potential enemies. It was originally meant as a wartime measure to control enemy aliens during actual conflicts, but its broad language allows for expansive interpretation. Notably, the Act can be invoked not only during declared wars but also during perceived invasions, a term that has been manipulated in recent political rhetoric. This flexibility in interpretation raises concerns about its application in a political climate that increasingly conflates immigration with national security.
Potential Political Misuse of the Act
Political figures have suggested that the Alien Enemies Act could be mobilized for large-scale deportations, a prospect that could deeply affect the lives of millions of non-citizens. Current political discourse has already begun framing certain migrant groups as invaders, which mirrors tactics that have historically led to widespread discrimination and violence. Furthermore, the application of this Act could stretch to legal immigrants, including those with permanent residency, heightening fears of indiscriminate enforcement actions targeting various communities. Such a situation underscores the pressing need for vigilance against any potential misuse of historical laws that threaten rights and liberties.
Calls for Legislative Reforms
In light of the considerable dangers posed by the Alien Enemies Act, there are growing calls for legislative reforms to abolish it completely. Advocates are pushing for initiatives that would formally repeal the Act, arguing that it not only threatens vulnerable populations but also contradicts contemporary principles of due process and equal protection. Additionally, some lawmakers are advocating for formal apologies for historical injustices stemming from its past applications, seeking both accountability and recognition of the harms caused. These efforts aim to prevent future abuses by ensuring that such sweeping powers are removed from the legal framework of the United States.
It’s easy to dismiss nativist rhetoric as mere Trumpy “locker room talk.” But when it comes to immigration, deportation and even detention, rhetoric about foreigners and violent invaders is actually a legal long game. Toward the end of the summer of 2023, Katherine Yon Ebright, counsel in the Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program, noticed that rightwing anti immigration groups and the Trump campaign had started talking in earnest about using a very old law with a very dark history, in order to do very chilling things to immigrants. She started researching the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, the sole operative part of the notorious Alien and Sedition Acts. By October 2024, Donald Trump was invoking the statute in most of his stump speeches, saying he intends to use it to carry out the mass deportations of non-citizens, without due process and with domestic law enforcement deployed to full effect. We are already seeing Texas trying to use the language of “foreign invasion” to achieve exactly these ends. On this week’s Amicus podcast, Dahlia Lithwick asks Katherine Yon Ebright to help the rest of us catch up with her deep dive on this dangerous law, and to explain why we should take the threats to use it literally and seriously.
Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.