"How the Church can Defeat Trumpism" with Jonathan Rauch
Jan 27, 2025
auto_awesome
Jonathan Rauch, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and an advocate for liberal values, discusses how the Evangelical Church can counter Trumpism. He explores the dangers of post-liberalism and the erosion of trust in institutions accelerated by Trump's patronage politics. Rauch argues for a moral witness over political power from Christianity, emphasizing constructive engagement with democratic values. The conversation touches on the evolving dynamics within Christianity and the need for introspection amidst rising populism.
The evangelical church has the potential to counter Trumpism by promoting values of pluralism, tolerance, and civility in American democracy.
The concept of patrimonialism under Trump emphasizes loyalty over competence, posing risks to the effectiveness of governance and democratic norms.
A shift towards constructive, inclusive conversations within the evangelical community could foster societal healing and bridge divides in a polarized environment.
Deep dives
Christianity and Trump's Influence
The evangelical church is identified as a key institution that could counteract the rise of Trumpism and restore values of pluralism, tolerance, and civility. Contrary to popular belief that this religious group primarily contributed to Trump's success, the argument suggests that it has the potential to be a catalyst for positive change in American democracy. Authors advocate for an alliance with white conservative evangelicals, claiming they can be partners in safeguarding the future of liberal democracy. This perspective challenges the conventional notion that religion is solely a source of division and highlights its capacity for fostering communal values.
Patrimonialism versus Authoritarianism
The concept of patrimonialism is introduced as a notable shift in governance under Trump, characterizing a personal loyalty model reminiscent of a family business rather than a meritocratic bureaucracy. This governance style emphasizes personal loyalty over competence, resulting in detrimental effects on the professional civil service and the rule of law. The danger of this approach lies in its potential to erode institutional capacity and weaken democratic norms over time. While it may not lead to classical authoritarianism, it diminishes the effectiveness of government and can lead to corruption and incompetence.
The Dangers of Tribalism in Politics
A discussion around the erosion of trust in institutions acknowledges that both the left and right contribute to a climate of skepticism and tribalism regarding governance. The political environment has shifted toward an adversarial framework where individuals view each other as enemies rather than collaborators. This tribal mentality detracts from civil discourse and the potential for bipartisanship, further deepening divisions within society. As a result, the challenge lies in promoting understanding and fostering conversations that transcend partisan divides.
Faith and Secularism: Finding Common Ground
The relationship between Christianity and liberal democracy is examined, positing that both systems can benefit from alignment in values. The notion that Christianity encourages believers to act with civility and forgiveness is presented as critical for maintaining a functioning democracy. There is a call for Christians to actively engage with their teachings in a way that promotes democratic values, encouraging an inclusive approach to civic participation. This perspective advocates for a civil level of discourse in public life while reinforcing the importance of shared values in both faith and governance.
The Role of the Evangelical Church in Society
The evangelical church's potential to foster societal healing and dialogue is emphasized, particularly in light of recent political tensions. The conversation critiques the historical alignment of evangelical values with overt partisanship and calls for a reevaluation of this relationship. By engaging in constructive conversations rather than divisive rhetoric, there is an opportunity for evangelicals to contribute positively to public life. The church is encouraged to embrace its role as a forum for moral and ethical discussions that can bridge gaps between communities.
White, conservative, evangelical American Christians helped to bring Donald Trump to power. Their political activism is turbo-charged by populist right-wing "post-liberals" who believe traditions like civility and pluralism are passé -- people including entertainers like Tucker Carlson and Curtis Yarvin, as well as intellectuals like Sohrab Amari, Patrick Deneen and Rod Dreher.
These "post-liberals" are correct in some of their criticisms of modern America but wrong in their solutions, argues today's guest, Jonathan Rauch. And who's best-placed to defeat them? Paradoxically, this atheist Jew argues: the Evangelical Church.
Rauch has spent his life fighting for liberal values. At The Economist magazine, he pioneered its editorial embrace of gay marriage long before that was popular. His hugely influential books include "The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth", about which Josh and Sam Harris interviewed him on Sam's podcast, Making Sense, in 2024.
Today: What happens to American democracy if Christianity can no longer perform the functions on which our constitutional order depends? Josh and Jonathan wrestle it out.
Rauch is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a contributing editor of The Atlantic. His new book, "Cross Purposes: Christianity's Broken Bargain with Democracy", is available at https://tinyurl.com/y8ejdd5z
Watch this conversation on YouTube. And you’re missing out on our best ad-free content if you haven’t popped over to the Uncomfy Convos Substack page.