Justice Kagan, a Supreme Court Justice known for her thought-provoking views on judicial reform, joins President Biden, who has proposed significant changes to the Supreme Court. They explore the importance of ethical standards within the court and the implications of proposed reforms. Leonard Leo, a prominent legal figure, critiques the Democratic approach to the court. The discussion touches on judicial collegiality, the evolving interpretation of Title IX, and even a lighthearted debate about the true nature of ‘boneless chicken wings.’
Justice Kagan's insights highlight the complex dynamics of judicial appointments and the implications of proposed reforms on judicial independence.
The podcast explores health benefits associated with standing desks, emphasizing their potential to enhance productivity and combat fatigue at work.
A recent DC Circuit ruling underscores First Amendment issues, particularly regarding social media moderation and the necessity for viewpoint-neutral restrictions.
Deep dives
The Benefits of Standing Desks
Using a standing desk has potential health benefits, including increased alertness and reduced feelings of fatigue during the day. One speaker shares their experience of swaying back and forth at their desk, feeling more focused and balanced while working. Moving between sitting and standing is suggested to enhance productivity and combat the afternoon slump often felt during long hours at a desk. This movement may help individuals feel more energized and engaged in their tasks.
Upcoming Series on Legal Books
Throughout August, the podcast will pivot to a series focused on legal books, featuring various authors. Notable authors like Keith Whittington and Yuval Levin are highlighted as guests, with plans to discuss their insights and perspectives on legal matters. This change in focus aims to delve deeper into the literature that shapes the legal landscape while still addressing pressing legal topics in each episode. The hosts emphasize the excitement surrounding their guests and the discussions to come.
Justice Kagan's Remarks and Supreme Court Reforms
Justice Kagan's recent remarks to the Ninth Circuit provided insights into the complexities of having an unelected Supreme Court Justice as a pivotal vote in contentious cases. She reflects on Justice O'Connor's impact during her tenure and raises questions about the viability and implications of Supreme Court reforms proposed by President Biden. The discussion touches on the political dynamics that influence judicial appointments and how justices may not adhere strictly to the party lines of their appointing presidents. Kagan's critiques shed light on the broader implications for judicial independence and the judicial nomination process.
The Mystery of Docket Size
Justice Kagan expresses uncertainty about the current low number of cases accepted by the Supreme Court, citing the influence of the cert pool and changing justices' philosophies. She notes that while some believe clerks may be reticent in bringing cases to the Court, the reasons for the decrease in cert grants remain somewhat elusive. The conversation considers how the emergency docket has shifted the dynamics of case acceptance, raising the question of whether justices prioritize specific types of cases over others. This inconsistency invites speculation around the factors influencing the justices' certiorari decisions.
First Amendment Implications for the NIH
A recent ruling by the DC Circuit concerning the National Institutes of Health (NIH) highlights First Amendment issues around social media engagement and comment moderation. The case revolves around the NIH's decision to filter comments containing specific keywords, which led to a legal challenge over viewpoint discrimination. The court concluded that the NIH's actions created a limited public forum, necessitating that restrictions be viewpoint-neutral and reasonable. This ruling underscores the responsibility of public institutions to maintain free expression standards, even in digital communication channels.
Justice Kagan makes remarks to the 9th Circuit and President Biden proposes SCOTUS reforms. The usual slow-moving summer legal news drag is disrupted by a number interesting cases and eye-raising comments.
Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including Sarah’s Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here.
