Sam Bankman-Fried, a potential guest, was expected to take the stand in court. Michael Lewis joins Lidia Jean Kott to discuss the trial's events, including the government resting its case and the surprise twist of the jury being sent home. Topics explored include the defense presenting witnesses, Sam's evasive answers, the judge's perspective on Sam, and reflections on the trial's dynamics and expectations.
The defense's request to introduce the role of lawyers in Sam Bankman-Fried's life as a source of comfort was debated in court, highlighting the significance of legal representation in trial proceedings.
Sam Bankman-Fried's evasive way of answering questions during the trial was noted as a potential strategy to avoid addressing certain topics, but it was also acknowledged that it could potentially irritate the jury.
Deep dives
Rehearsal for Sam Benjamin Freed's testimony
During the podcast episode, there was a discussion about a rehearsal for Sam Benjamin Freed's testimony in the trial. The defense wanted to introduce the role that lawyers played in Sam's life to give him comfort in his decisions. The prosecution objected to this, and there was a debate about whether the jury should hear this testimony. The judge then asked to hear the testimony before making a final decision. It was noted that this was a rare occurrence in trials.
Sam's evasive answering of questions
A significant point discussed in the podcast was Sam Benjamin Freed's evasive way of answering questions during the trial. It was mentioned that he had a knack for not directly answering questions and redirecting the conversation. The podcast hosts and reporters, as well as the judge and prosecutor, noted this behavior. It was viewed as a strategy by Sam to avoid answering questions he didn't want to address, but it was also pointed out that it could potentially irritate the jury if continued.
Impressions of the trial proceedings
The podcast episode provided insights into the overall atmosphere and dynamics of the trial proceedings. The hosts mentioned how they observed the judge's authority and no-nonsense approach. They also commented on the professional conduct of the courtroom guards and the overall efficiency of the court process. The podcast hosts also shared their impressions of Sam Benjamin Fried's demeanor during the trial, noting his composed and persuasive manner of speaking. They discussed his ability to explain complex concepts, but also highlighted his tendency to be evasive when questioned.
Michael Lewis finishes his book tour and joins Lidia Jean Kott in court. His timing, as usual, is impeccable. The government rests its case. And then, everyone thinks Sam Bankman-Fried will take the stand. Instead, in a surprise twist, Judge Kaplan sends the jury home. LJ and Michael meet up on the courthouse steps to talk through the day’s events.
This conversation was recorded on October 26.
Questions for Michael? Submit them by clicking the link in our show notes or visiting atrpodcast.com
To access bonus episodes, and to listen to all of our coverage ad-free, sign up for Pushkin plus on the Against The Rules show page in Apple Podcasts or at Pushkin.fm/plus.