Candidates Should Stop Pushing Special Tax Carveouts
Aug 16, 2024
auto_awesome
Adam Michel, a tax policy expert, dives into the murky waters of special tax benefits proposed by presidential candidates like Harris and Trump. He argues that eliminating taxes on tips and Social Security may look appealing but could undermine a fair tax system. Michel emphasizes the importance of broad tax bases and warns against creating loopholes that favor specific groups. He also touches on the complexities of these proposals and their potential impacts on the Social Security Trust Fund, urging a more equitable approach to tax reform.
Special tax exemptions for certain income types can create inefficiencies and undermine the simplicity of tax policy.
Eliminating taxes on tips and Social Security benefits poses significant fiscal risks and challenges to political feasibility.
Deep dives
The Issues with Targeted Tax Exemptions
Tax proposals to exempt specific types of income, such as tips and Social Security benefits, may undermine the goal of achieving a simpler and lower tax regime. Lowering overall tax rates on income is beneficial, but selectively exempting certain incomes introduces inefficiencies and encourages manipulation of the system. For instance, if tipped income were to be completely tax-exempt, it could incentivize businesses to reclassify parts of their employee compensation as tips, rather than higher wages, leading to unequal treatment among workers. This kind of gaming presents risks of creating a fragmented tax system where some sources of income are unfairly privileged over others, ultimately complicating tax policy and raising rates on remaining taxable income.
Political Feasibility and Economic Consequences
Proposals to eliminate taxes on tips and Social Security benefits face significant challenges in terms of political feasibility and fiscal responsibility. Such exemptions could exacerbate the insolvency issues of the Social Security Trust Fund, as they would lead to considerable revenue loss, complicating future budget discussions. Political momentum may support these tax cuts, but the realities of congressional reconciliation and revenue generation present hurdles that could hinder their implementation. The balancing act becomes increasingly difficult as reducing taxes without addressing spending constraints may lead to an unsustainable fiscal situation.
Presidential candidates Harris and Trump both seem amenable to special tax benefits for their favored groups of voters, be they tipped workers or recipients of Social Security benefits. Is that good tax policy? Adam Michel explains.