Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey
Ep 1172 | No, the SAVE Act Doesn’t Stop Married Women from Voting
Apr 15, 2025
The discussion revolves around the SAVE Act and its implications for married women's voting rights, debunking myths and addressing fears. In stark contrast, a heartbreaking incident highlights the dangers of pit bull ownership after a tragic attack on a newborn. The hosts also share nostalgic moments from a digital-free golf tournament, emphasizing the importance of personal connections. Additionally, a satirical take on gay dads and parenting sparks laughter and reflection on modern family dynamics.
58:39
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The SAVE Act seeks to enhance election integrity by mandating proof of citizenship for voter registration, despite criticisms from the Left regarding its impact on married women voters.
- Recent tragic incidents involving pit bulls have heightened concerns about the breed’s safety in family households, especially with children present, emphasizing the need for responsible ownership.
Deep dives
Impact of the SAVE Act on Women's Voting Rights
The SAVE Act, an acronym for the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, has generated significant controversy, particularly among liberal activists who claim it threatens married women's ability to vote. Critics argue that the legislation, which mandates proof of citizenship for voter registration, will disproportionately impact married women who change their last names after marriage. However, an examination of the bill shows that it does not explicitly target any demographic, and married women, who often vote Republican, are unlikely to be suppressed by this act. The bill aims to enhance election integrity by ensuring that only citizens can register to vote, which proponents argue is a common-sense measure.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
