5 ethical principles for digitizing humanitarian aid | Aarathi Krishnan
Dec 6, 2024
auto_awesome
Aarathi Krishnan, a tech and human rights ethicist and thought leader in international humanitarian aid, dives into the digitization of aid and its ethical implications. She uncovers the risks of biometric IDs and government surveillance, emphasizing the need for informed consent. Krishnan presents five ethical principles to steer humanitarian tech innovation, advocating for equity and accountability. She urges a reflection on past injustices to shape a future where technology truly benefits vulnerable communities.
Aarathi Krishnan underscores the pressing need for ethical principles in humanitarian tech to safeguard vulnerable populations from digital exploitation.
The podcast highlights the necessity of informed consent and transparency when implementing technology in humanitarian aid to protect individual rights.
Deep dives
The Cost of Surveillance in Housing
Surveillance technologies, such as facial recognition cameras, have begun infiltrating subsidized housing without tenant consent, raising significant privacy concerns. Residents of Brooklyn's Atlantic Plaza Towers opposed these installations due to their potential invasion of privacy and discriminatory failures, particularly against women and people of color. Legislation has been proposed to address these issues, specifically the No Biometric Barriers to Housing Act of 2021, aiming to restrict the use of such invasive technologies in public housing. This highlights a broader dialogue on the ethical implications of surveillance in living spaces, especially for low-income individuals who face heightened scrutiny and privacy violations.
Rohingya Refugees and Digital Rights
The case of Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh illustrates the perilous intersection of technology and human rights, where biometric identification systems have been poorly managed and exploited. Following their displacement, many refugees were coerced into enrolling for government-issued digital IDs, which inadvertently linked them to their persecutors. Human Rights Watch indicated that sensitive information about these individuals was shared without proper consent, heightening their vulnerability to government retaliation. This raises serious ethical questions regarding the use of technology in humanitarian relief efforts and the need for stringent oversight and respect for individual rights.
Ethics in Humanitarian Technology
The rapid adoption of technology within humanitarian aid often lacks critical ethical considerations, risking harm to vulnerable populations instead of delivering the promised benefits. Arthi Krishnan emphasizes the need for a deliberate approach to technology deployment by highlighting the importance of understanding the demographics affected and ensuring adequate consent and transparency. The existence of technologies designed with scant regard for the communities they serve can perpetuate existing inequalities and control mechanisms. To create a more equitable future in aid distribution, Krishnan proposes a framework that questions the impact of technological interventions and prioritizes the rights and dignity of those in need.
Over the last decade, humanitarian organizations have digitized many of their systems, from registering refugees with biometric IDs to transporting cargo via drones. This has helped deliver aid around the world, but it's also brought new risks to the people it's meant to protect. This week we're revisiting a talk by tech and human rights ethicist Aarathi Krishnan who points to the dangers of digitization — like sensitive data getting into the hands of the wrong people — and lays out five ethical principles to help inform humanitarian tech innovation. After the talk, our host Sherrell shares a practical way to assess the costs and benefits of digitizing aid using Krishnan's principles.