Gavin Ortlund, a theologian with a PhD from Fuller Theological Seminary and President of Truth Unites, dives deep into the relationship between tradition and scripture. He challenges the notion that apostolic tradition contradicts sola Scriptura, illustrating how they can coexist harmoniously. Ortlund explores fascinating historical examples, like the moral teachings derived from Aurelia, a wealthy Christian woman. He also sheds light on the complexities of defining authentic apostolic teachings, particularly regarding the Immaculate Conception and its interpretations.
The podcast explores the balance between Sola Scriptura and the adherence to apostolic tradition as mentioned in key biblical passages.
It emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between direct apostolic teachings and potentially fallible modern claims of tradition.
Deep dives
Understanding Sola Scriptura
Sola Scriptura posits that Scripture serves as the sole infallible authority for the Church, raising questions about how it aligns with biblical passages that mention traditions. Specifically, 1 Corinthians 11:2 and 2 Thessalonians 2:15 call for adherence to traditions delivered either orally or in writing, suggesting a twofold approach to instruction. The tension arises from the differing interpretations of 'tradition,' where proponents of Sola Scriptura argue that these passages do not undermine its principle but rather necessitate a clarification of the term 'tradition.' This clarification reveals that apostolic tradition must be understood within context, emphasizing that written Scripture remains the definitive source of apostolic teaching in a post-apostolic age.
The Nature of Apostolic Tradition
The distinction between direct apostolic teaching and subsequent claims of apostolic tradition is crucial in understanding Sola Scriptura. While early Christians like Aurelia received teachings directly from apostles, modern interpretations of apostolic tradition, such as those claimed by Catholic doctrine, are viewed as fallible and not infallibly authoritative. This perspective is illustrated by contrasting examples of tradition: Aurelia receiving oral instructions compared to a contemporary believer grappling with established dogmas that claim apostolic roots. The recognition and acceptance of certain traditions depend on their connection to direct apostolic instruction, which is documented in Scripture, as opposed to later, potentially erroneous claims.
Assessing the Validity of Traditions
The validity of traditions mentioned in the New Testament, particularly in reference to ethical and doctrinal instructions, is uncertain, yet not problematic for Sola Scriptura. Acknowledging that Scripture may not encapsulate all apostolic teachings allows for a broader understanding of traditions without contesting their relevance. The focus remains on what can be verified through the biblical text, as oral traditions can become tainted through flawed transmission processes, akin to a 'telephone game.' Therefore, the goal is to ensure that any traditions followed align closely with those teachings documented in Scripture, supporting the foundational aim of adhering to the apostles' authentic messages.
In this video Gavin Ortlund discusses whether the commandment to obey apostolic tradition in I Corinthians 11:2 and II Thessalonians 2:15 contradicts sola Scriptura.
Truth Unites exists to promote gospel assurance through
theological depth.
Gavin Ortlund (PhD, Fuller Theological Seminary) is
President of Truth Unites and Theologian-in-Residence at Immanuel Nashville.
