#019 Wes Huff—Adding or Deleting Books from the Bible? - Jimmy Akin
Jan 27, 2025
auto_awesome
Wes Huff, a rising Protestant apologist and PhD student in New Testament, dives deep into the formation of the biblical canon. He discusses intense debates on the inclusion of deuterocanonical books and the influence of ancient manuscripts like the Codex Sinaiticus. Wes critiques his own past views and explores the complexities surrounding canonical authority. He emphasizes the importance of constructive dialogue in understanding differing perspectives, making for a thought-provoking discussion filled with insights on faith and biblical scholarship.
Wes Huff effectively challenges controversial claims about the 'Sinai Bible,' emphasizing the necessity of accurate historical references in biblical scholarship.
The podcast reveals complexities in the formation of the biblical canon, highlighting differing perspectives among early Christians and ancient Jewish communities.
Deep dives
The Nature of the Sinai Bible Debate
The debate surrounding the concept of the 'Sinai Bible' becomes a focal point, particularly with the controversial claims made by Billy Carson regarding the absence of the crucifixion of Jesus in this text. Clarification arises when Wes Huff questions Carson about the precise meaning of the 'Sinai Bible,' ultimately linking it to Codex Sinaiticus, a crucial fourth-century Greek manuscript known for including the accounts of Jesus' crucifixion. This interaction illustrates a significant misunderstanding in biblical scholarship, as Codex Sinaiticus holds a text consistent with modern translations regarding key events in the Gospels. Wes effectively counters Carson's position, showcasing the importance of accurate historical references and the scholarly integrity required in theological discussions.
Understanding the Differences in Biblical Canons
The conversation addresses the misconception that Protestants removed books from the Bible during the Reformation while asserting that Catholics added them in response. Wes seeks to maintain a balanced perspective but falls into oversimplifications, particularly by framing Protestant actions as categorically untrue and Catholic additions as merely simplistic. The reality is that while there was a broad agreement on several deuterocanonical books among early Christians, the Protestant reformers indeed dismissed books previously accepted by the majority, indicating a more complex historical narrative than Wes acknowledges. The history of the biblical canon involves varied opinions and decisions made over centuries, necessitating a nuanced understanding rather than a binary narrative.
The Complexity of Jewish Canon Formation
Wes's assertions about the Jewish view of scripture during the time of Jesus are highlighted as overly simplified, suggesting a uniform rejection of deuterocanonical writings that fails to account for diverse perspectives within ancient Jewish communities. Different groups such as the Pharisees, Sadducees, and the Qumran community had varying views on scripture, revealing a lack of consensus on the canon during the first century. Moreover, Wes's interpretation overlooks critical scholarly insights that identify multiple traditions existing side by side, each recognizing different texts as authoritative. This complexity is essential for understanding how both Christian and Jewish canons developed through a dynamic interplay of tradition and belief.
Evaluating the Role of the Catholic Church in Canon Development
Wes makes the claim that the Catholic Church did not give us the Bible, suggesting instead that the Bible's existence led to the formation of the Church, a viewpoint critiqued for lacking consideration of historical and theological contexts. The reality is that the early Church, comprised of believers in the apostolic tradition, actively contributed to the formation and identification of the biblical canon through councils and communal consent. While acknowledging divine inspiration, it is equally important to recognize the role of the Catholic Church in discerning which texts held apostolic authority leading to their inclusion in the canon. This dual understanding highlights the intricate relationship between scripture and the Church it has cultivated over the centuries.
Wes Huff is a young Protestant apologist who has recently had a lot of success. He has admirable qualities, and he does better than many other Protestant apologists do.In this video, Jimmy Akin—in a friendly spirit of “iron sharpens iron” (Prov. 27:17)—take a look at both some of Wes’s strong points and his weak points, particularly when it comes to his knowledge of how the biblical canon was formed.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
