
Speaking Out of Place
Diana Buttu and Richard Falk on the Broad Significance of the ICJ’s Ruling on the Israeli Occupation
Jul 21, 2024
Diana Buttu and Richard Falk discuss the ICJ ruling on Israeli occupation, calling for an end to the occupation and dismantling of apartheid structures. They explore the implications of the ruling, Israel's dismissive response, and the challenges of enforcing international law. The podcast also touches on Nuremberg jurisprudence, evolving narratives on Israel-Palestine, and the exclusion of recent events in occupied Palestine from the advisory opinion.
46:30
Episode guests
AI Summary
Highlights
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The International Court of Justice ruled Israeli settlements in the West Bank violate international law, leading to Israel's pariah status.
- The ICJ's advisory opinion emphasized the need for countries to implement findings and the role of civil society in holding Israel accountable.
Deep dives
International Court of Justice's Determination on Israeli Settlements
The International Court of Justice declared on July 19th that Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem and the associated regime violate international law. It called for ending the occupation, dismantling the supporting apartheid structure, and removing Israeli settlers. Despite this, Israel dismissed the report and positioned itself above international law, earning a pariah state status in the international community.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.