Rep. Curt Weldon: It’s Time to Finally Tell the Truth About 9-11
Apr 14, 2025
auto_awesome
Curt Weldon, a former U.S. Congressman from Pennsylvania, delves into his controversial questioning of the 9/11 report, which led to political retaliation and scrutiny. He reveals how governmental failings may have allowed the attacks to happen and discusses alleged cover-ups within intelligence agencies. Weldon sheds light on the FBI's intimidating tactics against him, the political maneuvering around Osama bin Laden, and calls for accountability and transparency in 9/11 investigations, challenging the narratives that have persisted for decades.
Curt Weldon reveals that questioning the 9-11 narrative cost him his congressional career, illustrating the risks of political dissent.
He criticizes the 9-11 Commission Report as a cover-up, arguing that critical voices were excluded, which impacts public accountability.
Weldon highlights the systemic failures within intelligence agencies, particularly in communication, that hampered efforts to prevent the 9-11 attacks.
Deep dives
Kurt Weldon's Political Journey and 9-11 Questions
Kurt Weldon, a former congressman from Pennsylvania, reflects on his political career and the consequences of questioning the government's narrative surrounding 9-11. Once poised to lead the Armed Services Committee, his trajectory changed dramatically after he raised concerns about the intelligence failures related to the attacks. Following his inquiries, the FBI targeted his family, ultimately leading to his exit from Congress and cementing the perception that his political career was sabotaged. Throughout the discussion, Weldon emphasizes the importance of exploring the unanswered questions surrounding 9-11 and contends that many officials harbor similar concerns.
The Gilmore Commission and Failures in Intelligence
Weldon highlights his role in establishing the Gilmore Commission, which aimed at improving national security in light of past intelligence failures. Despite the commission's work, he asserts that much of its recommendations were co-opted by the 9-11 Commission without proper credit. He specifically points to barriers erected by the FBI and CIA in sharing intelligence, emphasizing the need for a more integrated approach to national security. This lack of communication is framed as a critical factor in the failure to prevent the attacks, raising concerns about systemic issues within the intelligence community.
The Able Danger Team and Counter-Terrorism Intelligence
Weldon recalls the efforts of the Able Danger team, which was tasked with identifying terrorist cells, including al-Qaeda, prior to the 9-11 attacks. He states that this team successfully identified key members of the New York cell but faced immense obstacles when attempting to share this intelligence with the FBI. Each attempt to relay their findings was reportedly blocked by higher authorities, suggesting a significant systemic failure. This blockade raises serious questions about whether the government could have acted on critical insights that might have averted the tragedy.
Critique of the 9-11 Commission Report
Weldon expresses vehement disapproval of the 9-11 Commission Report, describing it as incomplete and a cover-up of the failures that led to the attacks. He underscores that pivotal voices, including himself and individuals with firsthand knowledge of the events, were not allowed to testify before the commission. This exclusion has fueled his belief that the report does not accurately reflect the intelligence failures that contributed to 9-11. He argues that the public deserves a comprehensive understanding of the events leading up to that day to foster accountability and prevent future assaults.
Pentagon Whistleblower and Intelligence Manipulation
Weldon shares information about a Pentagon inspector general who sought whistleblower protection after being instructed to lie to Congress about 9-11-related intelligence. This incident highlights the lengths to which certain agencies might go to cover up information that contradicts their narrative. The inspector general’s report indicates a troubling culture within the intelligence community, dissuading whistleblowing and accountability. Weldon connects this issue to a broader trend of prioritizing agency reputation over the truth, presenting this manipulation as a key failure of the intelligence system.
Firefighters and the Cover-Up Narrative
Weldon emphasizes the experiences of firefighters from 9-11, particularly discussing the testimony of those who witnessed explosions at Ground Zero. He asserts that many firefighters believe there was more to the collapse of the buildings than officially reported, with some even suggesting controlled demolition as a possibility. He contends that firefighters, who bravely faced danger that day, have been pressured to remain silent regarding their experiences. By sharing their perspectives, he believes it’s possible to bring critical insights to light, further supporting the call for a new commission to investigate the attacks.
After twenty years in congress, Curt Weldon was about to become chairman of the House Armed Services Committee when he publicly questioned the accuracy of the 9-11 report. In retaliation, the Bush administration sent federal agents to his daughter’s house and ended his political career. At 77, Weldon has decided to tell the truth about what actually happened on September 11, 2001.
(00:00) Introduction
(02:33) Why Did They Oust Weldon?
(07:12) Could the CIA Have Prevented 9/11?
(16:00) How the FBI Tried to Intimidate Weldon
(19:23) Did the CIA Lie About Osama bin Laden’s Location?
(34:27) Trump’s Biggest Challenge Right Now
(36:09) How the Deep State Undermined Weldon’s Political Career
