Ankush Khardori, a senior writer at POLITICO and former federal prosecutor, dives into the controversial pardon of Hunter Biden by President Joe Biden. They discuss the implications of perceived favoritism and the contradiction to Biden's previous promises. The conversation also covers the intricate legal issues surrounding Hunter's charges and the potential biases in the justice system. Khardori further explores the political ramifications of this pardon, questioning Biden's legacy and the profound impacts of presidential pardons on governance.
Biden's pardon of Hunter underscores potential bias in legal proceedings involving political families, raising questions about fairness in the justice system.
The political implications of this pardon could set a concerning precedent for the use of presidential pardon powers to protect family members from legal scrutiny.
Deep dives
Presidential Pardon for Hunter Biden
Joe Biden granted a presidential pardon to his son Hunter in response to two significant legal issues: gun charges stemming from lying about drug use to purchase a firearm, and tax evasion for underreporting over $1.5 million. The uniqueness of these cases lies in the assertion that they were prosecuted specifically because of Hunter's familial connection to the president, which raises questions about fairness in the justice system. Hunter's situation would likely be uncommon for any individual not in a similar high-profile position, and this brings to light the complexity and potential bias in legal proceedings involving political families. The implications of this pardon extend beyond legal ramifications and underscore ongoing debates about the legitimacy and ethics of the pardon power in the U.S.
The Nature of the Charges
The charges against Hunter Biden highlight a potential double standard in federal prosecution, particularly regarding drug use and tax issues. The case of lying on the application for a gun purchase due to drug addiction is rare; usually, such inaccuracies pertain to whether the gun is being purchased for someone else. This raises concerns about selective prosecution, as Hunter Biden was unlikely to face similar charges if he were not the son of a sitting president. The tax case reveals a trend in which first-time offenders typically face fines or repayment rather than criminal charges, further illustrating the extraordinary nature of Hunter's legal troubles.
Political Implications and Reactions
The political ramifications of this pardon are profound, as it reflects the current landscape of U.S. politics where equality in justice is questioned. Critics argue that Joe Biden's actions undermine the integrity of the judicial process and reflect a hypocritical stance on the issues surrounding law enforcement and political accountability. Furthermore, this event could set a concerning precedent if it appears to normalize the use of pardon powers to shield family members from legal consequences. As political tension continues, especially with potential future investigations from a Trump-led administration, the Biden family's legal protection remains a contentious topic with far-reaching implications.
How problematic is it for Joe Biden to pardon his son Hunter after promising, again and again, that he wouldn’t?
Guest: Ankush Khardori, senior writer for POLITICO and a former federal prosecutor at the Department of Justice.
Want more What Next? Join Slate Plus to unlock full, ad-free access to What Next and all your other favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the What Next show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.