So what is different than what we already have in the THOR recommendations, the JTS DCR clinical Practice Guideline and the Ranger Regiment TDCR? No hextend?! Calcium with the 1st unit of blood?! TXA slow push?! What if the patient is not responding to resuscitation efforts? This is a guideline truly written for the Medic working despite lack of help or resources in an austere environment…

When reviewing and editing this evidence-based consensus guideline there were lengthy discussions about the realities of some of the issues mentioned above. One of the biggest questions came when discussing TCCC because there are slight differences with the CoTCCC guidelines which were written specifically for a medic treating a patient sequentially in the combat environment.

I will attempt to explain the thought process of the group of authors as I understood the conversations and email chains in order to help you make a better decision for your practice. That fact alone makes this guideline different. It is specifically written for an independent duty medic or corpsman who has the flexibility to make decisions about the care based on available evidence for the patient which may or may not yet exist in which case expert consensus was used.

Guidelines for medics must be written in a linear manner because they do not merely manage the care of a patient as part of a large team working together, they manage, prioritize, and physically complete each task one after another. Training other team members to complete certain tasks can greatly assist the medic. Gains in the quality of care and outcomes can come from optimizing a dedicated trauma system. When that system is a single person working problems in series, the variables must be looked at in a sequential manner because that is how they are performed. The administration of TXA comes to mind when talking about these minute changes.

TXA Slow Push: TXA is not the cornerstone of austere resuscitation, administration of blood is. Since the CRASH2 TXA trial results and per manufacturer recommendations, it has been recommended that TXA be given slowly over 10 minutes so as to not cause transient hypotension. The provider should absolutely be aware of this possibility no matter how small of a chance it may have of occurring. Once aware and taken into account, a decision can be made for the current situation. Do they have time to get out an IV bag, reconstitute the TXA, Inject it into the bag, start a new IV/IO site, hook up the line, count the drips, adjust the drip rate multiple times and then check on the drip rate multiple times so as to make sure that 10 minutes is vehemently adhered to? Does this bring the risk of transient hypotension to absolute zero or does it merely reduce an already small chance? This guideline gives the medic the same guidance and recommendations from conclusions of the original study with the caveat not to waste time they or the patient may not have due to the situation or environment. If that IV line is already the second line, it may be needed for other adjuncts including calcium, pain control, sedation, antibiotics, antiemetics, etc. 10 minutes is a long time when someone is writhing in pain, vomiting, mentally altered while bleeding out. If on the other hand, a patient arrives to your aid station with 2 IVs, blood hanging, with appropriate sedation and analgesia, there is likely time to adhere to the slow drip over 10 minute recommendation. Again, it is the prerogative of the independent duty medic or corpsman to weigh the risks versus gain.

Life Is for Living