Podcast guest Jimmy Akin talks about Pascal's Wager as a practical solution for choosing between Christianity and skepticism. Choosing faith can bring benefits in this life and potentially in the next.
Pascal's Wager proposes that embracing faith is a rational choice when evidence fails to settle the question between Christianity and skepticism.
Accepting faith brings net benefits in terms of a moral life and the potential reward of infinite happiness in the afterlife if Christianity is true.
Deep dives
Pascal's Wager: A Practical Solution to a Dilemma
Pascal's Wager is a practical solution proposed by French philosopher Blais Pascal for individuals who cannot decide between Christianity and skepticism. When evidence fails to settle the question, Pascal suggests that practical reasoning may be employed. He compares the decision-making process to tossing a coin without knowing the outcome and argues that it can be rational to bet on one choice over another. In the context of choosing between Christianity and skepticism, Pascal proposes that embracing faith is the rational choice both in terms of this life and the next. While it comes with certain costs in this life, such as adhering to Christian morality, the benefits of believing outweigh the costs. Additionally, if Christianity proves to be true, one will gain infinite happiness in the afterlife, whereas if it is not true, one loses nothing as there would be no afterlife.
The Rationality of Embracing Faith
According to Pascal, accepting faith is rational from both a practical and an eternal standpoint. In this life, embracing faith brings about net benefits despite the costs, as it leads to a moral life. Pascal argues that living according to Christian principles offers more fulfillment and happiness compared to indulging in worldly pleasures. Moreover, in the next life, if Christianity is true, the reward of attaining infinite happiness in heaven outweighs any potential losses of living a faithful life. Therefore, Pascal suggests that accepting faith is the rational choice for individuals torn between Christianity and skepticism.
1.
Practical Solution for Choosing Between Christianity and Skepticism
DAY 318
CHALLENGE
“I am unable to decide between Christianity and skepticism, and it doesn’t help to review the evidence. My dilemma seems insoluble.”
DEFENSE
In his Pensées, the French philosopher Blaise Pascal proposed a practical solution that became known as Pascal’s Wager.
He proposed that, if evidential reasoning cannot settle the question for a particular person, then practical reasoning may (see Day 336).
Pascal’s Wager can be put different ways (in fact, Pascal himself put it more than one way), but here we will follow his main presentation of it.
He compared the decision of …
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode