Podcast explores the potential for a new civil war in the US and the challenges faced by right-wing groups near the Texas border. It also discusses the misconceptions of a civil war and the power of mutual aid in helping migrant communities. Furthermore, it addresses restrictive gender-affirming care policies, deceptive tactics in anti-abortion and anti-trans legislation, and the influence of small groups with unpopular ideologies. The podcast delves into the influence of gender therapists and the flaws in the standards of care for transgender individuals. It also explores the consequences faced by trans people, the impact of the incentive structure on suffering, and the backlash against measure 110 in Portland. The podcast highlights the reality of drug use and crime, erosion of personal privacy rights, regulations on drone use by police departments, and the lack of transparency in police drone surveillance.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Ohio's legislature implemented restrictive rules that make it almost impossible to access gender-affirming care, reflecting a trend of increasing restrictions on trans healthcare.
Right-wing transitioners and radical feminist groups have collaborated in supporting anti-trans legislation, raising questions about motivations and influences.
Anti-trans legislation employs pseudoscience and misinformation to restrict access to necessary healthcare, echoing strategies used in anti-abortion legislation.
Delegation stories are used selectively by medical professionals and anti-trans activists to justify gatekeeping and restrictions in gender-affirming care, rooted in transphobia.
Medical professionals have historically used gatekeeping practices to control trans people's access to care, using biased studies and amplifying detransition stories to justify restrictive policies.
Instead of using detransition stories for gatekeeping, the focus should be on providing comprehensive and supportive care for all trans individuals to challenge harmful narratives and practices.
Deep dives
Ohio Implements Draconian Rules on Gender Affirming Care
Ohio's legislature proposed a ban on all gender-affirming care for minors, which was vetoed by the state Republican governor. However, the governor implemented restrictive rules that make it almost impossible to access gender-affirming care. The rules require recommendations from various specialists, reporting of all gender-affirming care, and bans surgery for anyone under 18. These restrictions are similar to the British system, notorious for its difficult access to trans healthcare and long waitlists. The move by Ohio reflects a trend of increasing restrictions on trans healthcare, mirroring the tactics used in anti-abortion legislation. The restrictions are based on pseudoscience and actively hinder access to crucial medical care.
Ohio's anti-trans legislation has seen the involvement of right-wing transitioners who support restrictions on gender-affirming care. While some of these individuals may identify as left-wing or libertarian, they align with conservative goals. Their involvement in testifying for restrictive legislation highlights the complicated politics surrounding trans healthcare. Additionally, some radical feminist groups have opposed gender-affirming care, presenting themselves as a left-wing opposition to transgender rights. The collaboration between right-wing transitioners and radical feminist groups raises questions about the underlying motivations and influences behind anti-trans legislation.
Dangers of Pseudoscience and Misinformation in Anti-Trans Legislation
Anti-trans legislation is often based on pseudoscience and misinformation. Measures such as requiring invasive assessments, imposing counseling periods, and citing biased information about the risks of gender-affirming care are used to restrict access to necessary healthcare. These tactics echo the strategies employed in anti-abortion legislation. By utilizing misinformation and exploiting public fear and uncertainty, supporters of anti-trans legislation undermine the rights and well-being of transgender individuals, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and hindering their access to vital medical care.
The Influence of Detransition Stories on Gender Affirming Care
Detransition stories have been used by medical professionals and anti-trans activists to advocate for more gatekeeping and restrictions in gender affirming care. These individuals highlight detransition experiences to justify their desire for more control over trans people's access to healthcare. They often selectively use detransition narratives that fit their agenda, regardless of the reasons for detransitioning. By promoting detransition stories, they aim to create fear and doubt about transitioning and perpetuate the narrative that transition should be limited or prevented. This approach is deeply rooted in transphobia and disregards the diverse experiences and needs of trans individuals.
The Power Dynamics Within WPATH and Gatekeeping Practices
Medical professionals, including some within the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), have historically used gatekeeping practices to control trans people's access to gender affirming care. These practices involve requirements such as psychological assessments and real-life tests, treating trans individuals as objects rather than autonomous individuals. Some clinicians seek to find and amplify detransition stories to reinforce their desire for more control over trans people's healthcare. The use of biased and unrepresentative studies to support gatekeeping policies perpetuates harmful narratives and prevents individuals from accessing the care they need. Efforts should be focused on providing comprehensive and affirming care for trans individuals, rather than using detransition stories to justify restrictive practices.
Call for Supportive and Comprehensive Care for all Trans Individuals
Rather than using detransition stories as a tool for gatekeeping, the focus should be on creating comprehensive and supportive care for all trans individuals. Adequate resources and support should be provided for individuals who detransition or experience regrets to ensure their well-being and help them navigate their unique experiences. It is crucial to challenge the narratives that use detransition stories to restrict trans healthcare and instead center the diverse needs and experiences of trans individuals. By fostering an inclusive and affirming healthcare environment, we can dismantle harmful gatekeeping practices and work towards creating a more equitable and accessible system of care for all trans individuals.
The Impact of Measure 110 and the Backlash Against It
Measure 110 decriminalized simple possession and use of drugs in Oregon. Critics argue that the measure has led to an increase in drug addiction, public disorder, and crime rates. However, studies have shown no evidence of an association between decriminalization and fatal overdose rates. Furthermore, the backlash against Measure 110 is primarily driven by the fear of public drug use and the desire to search and arrest individuals suspected of possession. To fight back against the repeal of Measure 110, people can contact their elected leaders, stay informed through organizations like the Health Justice Recovery Alliance and the ACLU, and support harm reduction efforts and comprehensive treatment options.
The Success of Decriminalization in Portugal and Spain
Portugal and Spain have successfully decriminalized drug use and possession for over two decades. Studies have shown that decriminalization in Portugal led to reduced prison populations, lower overdose rates, and no surge in drug use. While Portugal has recently seen an increase in drug use, it remains below average compared to other Western European countries. Decriminalization has been effective in reducing harm and offering opportunities for recovery. It is important to recognize that addiction can have various causes, and a combination of harm reduction and traditional treatment approaches is needed to address the issue effectively.
Taking Action to Support Sensible Drug Policies
Individuals can take several actions to support sensible drug policies and prevent the repeal of Measure 110 in Oregon. These include contacting elected leaders to express support for harm reduction, staying informed through organizations like the ACLU and Health Justice Recovery Alliance, and contributing to recovery organizations or volunteering to help those struggling with addiction. Building relationships based on trust and understanding is key to encouraging individuals to seek treatment and recovery. It is important to challenge stigmatizing attitudes and recognize that addiction is a complex issue that requires comprehensive support and resources.
Chula Vista's Drone Fleet Increases Criminal Justice System Reach
Chula Vista, a medium-sized city in California, has deployed a drone fleet to extend the power of its police force. These drones are used to respond to non-emergency calls, allowing officers to focus on more urgent situations. By using drones to surveil and trail suspects involved in petty crimes, the police can increase the number of arrests and people funneled into the criminal justice system. While over 1,500 police departments in the US use drones, Chula Vista Police Department was the first to regularly dispatch drones in response to 911 calls. The department obtained a Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) waiver from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to allow drones to be remotely flown for longer periods in restricted airspace. However, the effectiveness of drones in reducing crime remains uncertain, with no third-party studies showing clear evidence of their impact. Additionally, privacy concerns arise as drones continuously record footage without public access or knowledge.
Chula Vista's Drone First Responder Program and Concerns
Chula Vista's drone program, known as Drone as First Responder (DFR), has faced criticism and legal challenges due to concerns about privacy and transparency. While the police department claims to be transparent and community-oriented, they have fought against requests for public access to drone footage. The city argued that releasing the footage would violate individual privacy rights, but the Fourth District Court of Appeals ruled against this exemption, highlighting the importance of transparency and accountability. The court's decision is still being appealed by Chula Vista, and the outcome will determine if the public will have access to the drone footage. The expansion of the DFR program to 24-hour surveillance raises further concerns about ubiquitous surveillance and police interaction with marginalized communities. The increasing use of drones in law enforcement, combined with other surveillance technologies, creates a potential for widespread and constant surveillance in communities.
All of this week's episodes of It Could Happen Here put together in one large file.
You can now listen to all Cool Zone Media shows, 100% ad-free through the Cooler Zone Media subscription, available exclusively on Apple Podcasts. So, open your Apple Podcasts app, search for “Cooler Zone Media” and subscribe today!
