Question of the Week #928: Quantum Unitarity and the Ascension of Jesus
Feb 27, 2025
auto_awesome
Explore the intriguing intersection of quantum principles and theological concepts, specifically regarding Christ's ascension. Delve into the implications of quantum unitarity on cosmological theories while seeking to reconcile science with faith. Uncover the nature of miracles as it relates to the ascension of Jesus, contrasting theistic and naturalistic views. Discover how divine beings may operate outside natural laws, sparking thought-provoking discussions on faith and science.
Quantum unitarity raises questions about information retention in the universe, particularly concerning theories related to black holes and cosmology.
The ascension of Jesus highlights the distinction between natural laws and divine miracles, suggesting God's intervention transcends quantum limitations.
Deep dives
Understanding Quantum Unitarity and Its Implications
Quantum unitarity posits that the total summation of all probabilities within a quantum system equals one, ensuring that no information can escape the universe. This principle raises challenges for cosmological theories, particularly those suggesting that information from a collapsed black hole could enter a new universe, such as Lee Smolin's theory. The dilemma arises when considering the ascension of Christ, which seemingly contradicts unitarity by implying that His bodily information left this universe. The discussion suggests that this conflict lies within the interpretation of miracles and the nature of God's intervention in the universe.
The Nature of Miracles and God's Intervention
The ascension of Jesus is framed as a miracle, allowing God, as a transcendent being, to perform acts outside the limitations of natural laws, including quantum unitarity. This perspective posits that miracles are not violations of natural laws but rather instances where a supernatural being modifies or transcends those laws. Hence, the occurrence of events leading to the loss of information does not necessarily contravene scientific principles as they only hold when nature operates independently of divine influence. Ultimately, the possibility of miracles is more rooted in theistic understanding than in a strictly naturalistic worldview.