#STRask Why Would Any Rational Person Have to Use Any Religious Book?
Dec 8, 2025
The discussion kicks off with the intriguing question of why rational thinkers might reference religious texts. Logical reasoning is examined alongside faith, exploring how revelation can complement understanding. The hosts critique the idea that effective apologetics could become redundant with a single unrefuted argument. They creatively tackle the challenge of igniting interest in apologetics, likening skeptics to 'wet wood.' Practical strategies, including role-playing and engaging dialogues, are offered to inspire more fruitful conversations about faith.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Reason Needs External Input
- Rationality requires data to operate, so perfect reasoners still need inputs beyond pure logic.
- Greg Koukl argues revelation or testimony supplies knowledge about God's mind that reason alone cannot produce.
Naturalism Isn't The Only Rational Start
- Naturalists often equate rationality with naturalism and dismiss non-natural claims a priori.
- Amy Hall notes this presuppositional move rules out knowledge of the divine by definition, not argument.
Use Apologetics To Present Evidence
- Apologetics is the process of presenting evidence and is not redundant even if good arguments exist.
- Greg Koukl says giving multiple evidences from different angles helps show that 'the smart money' supports Christianity.
