Working Class History

WCL15: Literature of the 1926 General Strike

Sep 16, 2026
Literary scholars Charles Ferrall and Dougal McNeill, co-authors of Writing the 1926 General Strike, explore why Britain’s General Strike became a literary event. They discuss working-class fiction, poetry, pamphlets, contested memories, crowds, regional voices, and the blurred line between modernism and realism. The strike’s impact on Lady Chatterley’s Lover and To the Lighthouse also comes under scrutiny.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

1926 Meant Defeat And Beginning

  • Left-wing writers remembered 1926 simultaneously as a crushing defeat and the beginning of something new.
  • Idris Davies captured that tension through images of soups, speeches, jazz bands, suffering, and “the great dream and the swift disaster.”
INSIGHT

Writers Took Sides In The Strike

  • The strike became literary because writers participated directly, while their experiences later shaped major works.
  • Auden supported the strike by driving for the TUC, whereas other future-famous writers performed volunteer strike-breaking work.
INSIGHT

Print Made The Strike A Literary Event

  • Print dominated public life in 1926, making newspapers, pamphlets, poetry, and literacy central to political struggle.
  • Strike bulletins used tightly rhymed verse to entertain readers, satirize government claims, and circulate working-class perspectives.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app